2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal distribution of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Chesapeake Bay oysters and waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
137
6
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
37
137
6
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Audemard et al 43 suggested that unexplored postharvest processing (PHP) methods to eliminate V. vulnifi cus from oysters, which use relaying to high salinity waters, could be an alternative strategy, considering that high salinities appear to negatively affect the survival of V. vulnifi cus. However, this study observed a negative correlation between salinity and V. parahaemolyticus, whereas no correlation was observed between salinity and V. vulnifi cus; this result is consistent with results obtained in other studies conducted in shellfi sh cultivation areas off the Brazilian coast 32,35 and in other parts of the world 41,44 . Although the V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnifi cus counts observed in the waters can be considered as low, it is important to note that in fi ltering shellfi sh such as oysters and mussels, these microorganisms are concentrated in their guts and in other tissues, with levels reaching up to 10 6 bacteria per gram of shellfi sh…”
Section: Parahaemolyticus Infections In the Pacifi C Northwest Andsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Audemard et al 43 suggested that unexplored postharvest processing (PHP) methods to eliminate V. vulnifi cus from oysters, which use relaying to high salinity waters, could be an alternative strategy, considering that high salinities appear to negatively affect the survival of V. vulnifi cus. However, this study observed a negative correlation between salinity and V. parahaemolyticus, whereas no correlation was observed between salinity and V. vulnifi cus; this result is consistent with results obtained in other studies conducted in shellfi sh cultivation areas off the Brazilian coast 32,35 and in other parts of the world 41,44 . Although the V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnifi cus counts observed in the waters can be considered as low, it is important to note that in fi ltering shellfi sh such as oysters and mussels, these microorganisms are concentrated in their guts and in other tissues, with levels reaching up to 10 6 bacteria per gram of shellfi sh…”
Section: Parahaemolyticus Infections In the Pacifi C Northwest Andsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The lowest abundance was observed in July (winter), when water and air temperature were lower, with values of 12 S in I2 and 10 S in C2 (Figure 2). This is in accordance with the results of previous studies (DePaola et al, 2003;Parveen et al, 2008), which reported higher bacterial quantities in environments with a higher water temperature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The present study also demonstrated that the infection rate of V. parahaemolyticus was much higher in summer months, suggesting that warm and humid climate is probably more suitable for the growth of V. parahaemolyticus. The relationship between temperature and V. parahaemolyticus density has been previously documented (23), with a significant positive association being observed between V. parahaemolyticus counts and water temperature or turbidity (24,25). In fact, V. parahaemolyticus counts in water showed a stronger correlation with turbidity during summer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%