2007
DOI: 10.2981/0909-6396(2007)13[75:sdafpo]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal Diet and Foraging Preference of Greater Kudu Tragelaphus Strepsiceros in the Llano Uplift of Texas

Abstract: The greater kudu Tragelaphus strepsiceros, a large African herbivore, occupies the browser trophic niche. This species has been introduced into selected areas of Texas inhabited by the white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus, a native browser. Based on similar trophic function, potential interspecific competition could exist between these two species. The objectives of our study were to: 1) describe the seasonal diets of greater kudu in Texas and 2) determine if greater kudu show preference for plants that mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(48 reference statements)
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of diets for which this characteristic was found to be independent in these studies spans seasonal differences in browse structural and nutrient composition, which have been repeatedly noted for natural diets of greater kudu (Owen-Smith and Cooper 1989;Gray et al, 2006). Given the uniformity of the results for the SF across the four animals, the SF measured in the present study should therefore be representative for greater kudu.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The range of diets for which this characteristic was found to be independent in these studies spans seasonal differences in browse structural and nutrient composition, which have been repeatedly noted for natural diets of greater kudu (Owen-Smith and Cooper 1989;Gray et al, 2006). Given the uniformity of the results for the SF across the four animals, the SF measured in the present study should therefore be representative for greater kudu.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…By contrast, Codron and Clauss (2010) reported no stratification of free-ranging greater kudus' rumen contents as quantified by the water content in the digesta of the dorsal and ventral rumen, which would suggest a 'moose-type' rumen physiology as observed in another large representative of the Tragelaphini, the eland (Taurotragus oryx) (Hejcmanová et al, 2020). This would also match the fact that greater kudus are strict browsers, both in their natural habitat, consistently reported across decades (Wilson et al, 1977;Owen-Smith and Cooper, 1989;Codron et al, 2007;Chinomona et al, 2018;Makhado et al, 2020), as well as in secondary habitats (Gray et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The greater kudu most often occurred in open woodland, grasslands and wooded grasslands but rarely occurred in the closed forest and shrubland. The reason for a wide distribution for Greater kudu as compared to the other angulates in the NSNP mainly related to the presence of preferred feed in these habitats, its ability to eat a greater variety of woody plant species that provide browse and get cover and protection (Vaughan et al 2000;Eden 2006;Gray et al 2007).…”
Section: Change In Population Size and Habitat Use Of Terrestrial Larmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor can be caused by conditions that provide a suitable habitat for foraging, living, or breeding. These conditions could support the existence of mammals in the ecosystem (Gray et al, 2007;Gray and Phan, 2011;Rovero et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%