2009
DOI: 10.1029/2009gl040396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal dependence of energetic electron precipitation: Evidence for a global role of lightning

Abstract: Analysis of the DEMETER spacecraft particle data shows that energetic electron precipitation exhibits a seasonal dependence consistent with lighting‐induced electron precipitation (LEP). Over the United States, energetic electron fluxes in the slot region (between L = 2 and 3) are significantly higher in the northern summer than in the winter, consistent with the seasonal variation of lightning activity in the Northern Hemisphere. The association of precipitating fluxes with lightning is explored using lightni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EB number followed seasonal variations at energy bands lower than 440 keV, with peaks occurring in the summer and winter, while EB valleys occurred in the spring and autumn. A comparison with the electron fluxes induced by lightning activity over the United States (Gemelos et al, 2009) showed the principal difference in having a unique maximum in the summer. To explain this discrepancy, it should be highlighted that Table 1 by using only the events where EBs preceded Eqs: (a) the unequal earthquake longitude distribution; (b) distribution of EBs in L-shell and difference time D, D increased with lower L; (c) a greater minimum depth for earthquakes occurrs at larger time difference with EBs occurrence; (d) EB anomalies with a probability greater than 96 % for M ≥ 7 earthquakes and with probability greater than 98 % for M ≥ 8 earthquakes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The EB number followed seasonal variations at energy bands lower than 440 keV, with peaks occurring in the summer and winter, while EB valleys occurred in the spring and autumn. A comparison with the electron fluxes induced by lightning activity over the United States (Gemelos et al, 2009) showed the principal difference in having a unique maximum in the summer. To explain this discrepancy, it should be highlighted that Table 1 by using only the events where EBs preceded Eqs: (a) the unequal earthquake longitude distribution; (b) distribution of EBs in L-shell and difference time D, D increased with lower L; (c) a greater minimum depth for earthquakes occurrs at larger time difference with EBs occurrence; (d) EB anomalies with a probability greater than 96 % for M ≥ 7 earthquakes and with probability greater than 98 % for M ≥ 8 earthquakes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Sauvaud et al (2008) investigated for a relationship between energetic electrons and ground-based VLF transmitter signals and reported enhancements in the ∼100-600 keV drift-loss cone electron fluxes at L values between 1.4 and 1.7 being due to the Australian NWC operations and ionospheric absorption. Gemelos et al (2009) reported that seasonal variations in energetic electrons were consistent with lighting-induced electron precipitation (LEP) over North America. These energetic electron fluxes in the slot region (between L = 2 and 3) were significantly higher in the summer than in the winter because of significant lightning activity in the Northern Hemisphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the United States, energetic electron fluxes in the slot region (between L = 2 and 3) are significantly higher in the northern summer than in the winter, consistent with the seasonal variation of lightning activity in the Northern Hemisphere (Gemelos et al, 2009) According to the model by Abel and Thorne (1998), electron scattering near the peak of the inner zone, L = 1.65, is dominated by VLF transmitter waves. At L = 2.4, diffusion by the lightning-generated (4.5 kHz) waves provides the dominant scattering process near the loss cone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…These authors investigated the significance of the lightning-generated whistlers, as also other sources, dealing with whistler frequencies up to 10 kHz and electrons of few hundreds of keV, at various L shells. Further studies on lightning-induced effects are in Inan et al (2007) and Gemelos et al (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%