1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00050-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal changes of hippocampus volume in parasitic cowbirds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
98
4
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
98
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results demonstrate sex-specific changes in the size of brain regions in birds and agree with the hypothesis that experience with nest searching is necessary for the seasonal increase of Hp volume seen in brood-parasitic female cowbirds (Clayton & Reboreda, 1997 Thus, it appears that housing cowbirds in large outdoor aviaries without host nests induces either a female-specific reduction in Hp volume compared to wild-caught cowbirds or a failure of the Hp to grow in captive birds compare to wild-caught birds. Although we cannot differentiate between these two possibilities with these data, we believe it is more likely that differences between WCF and CF are due to a lack of seasonal increase in Hp volume in CF rather than an induced decrease in Hp volume in CF.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results demonstrate sex-specific changes in the size of brain regions in birds and agree with the hypothesis that experience with nest searching is necessary for the seasonal increase of Hp volume seen in brood-parasitic female cowbirds (Clayton & Reboreda, 1997 Thus, it appears that housing cowbirds in large outdoor aviaries without host nests induces either a female-specific reduction in Hp volume compared to wild-caught cowbirds or a failure of the Hp to grow in captive birds compare to wild-caught birds. Although we cannot differentiate between these two possibilities with these data, we believe it is more likely that differences between WCF and CF are due to a lack of seasonal increase in Hp volume in CF rather than an induced decrease in Hp volume in CF.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Both male and female screaming cowbirds (M. rufoaxillaris) show a reduction in Hp volume in the nonbreeding season compared to the breeding season (Clayton & Reboreda, 1997), thus male Hp plasticity is possible in cowbirds. Obviously, more research is needed to isolate why we found sexspecific effects of captivity on Hp volume in M. a. obscurus despite a lack of sex-specific Hp size in wild birds of the population we studied.…”
Section: Cowbird Population Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female cowbirds, which spend their mornings in their egg-laying range either alone or followed by males, parasitize nests before sunrise when it is still dark and must, therefore, have an accurate memory of the locations of potential host nests [6,8]. Female brown-headed cowbirds have a larger hippocampus than males, whereas no sex difference exists in related species that are not brood parasites [9][10][11]. This difference in the hippocampus size between males and females may be present only in the breeding season [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female brown-headed cowbirds have a larger hippocampus than males, whereas no sex difference exists in related species that are not brood parasites [9][10][11]. This difference in the hippocampus size between males and females may be present only in the breeding season [11]. Sex and seasonal differences in spatial cognition in cowbirds, however, are not well understood [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 behaviours are made necessary due to environmental variations (Clayton & Krebs, 1994) such 49 as seasonality (Clayton et al, 1997), food availability (Healy & Krebs, 1992) and urbanisation 50 (Mettke-Hofmann, 2016). Cognitive factors can also speed up evolutionary and ecological 51 pattern changes during periods of rapid environmental change or extremes as a result of 52 cognition driving coping mechanisms (Roth et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%