2006
DOI: 10.3178/jjshwr.19.475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal Changes of a Spectral Reflectance Index, PRI (Photochemical Reflectance Index) in a Temperate Japanese Cypress Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In short-term (diurnal) variation, the PRI-ɛ relationship has been explained empirically as both linear (Filella et al, 1996;Trotter et al, 2002) and non-linear (Barton & North, 2001;Peñuelas et al, 1995). Although a few reports deal with both seasonal and short-term variations in the PRI-ɛ relationship (Nakaji et al, 2005(Nakaji et al, , 2006Nakanishi et al, 2006), our results indicate that the relationship could be expressed as nonlinear regression function when the data in all sky conditions and both time-scales are analyzed.…”
Section: Relationship Of ɛ and Single Indexmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…In short-term (diurnal) variation, the PRI-ɛ relationship has been explained empirically as both linear (Filella et al, 1996;Trotter et al, 2002) and non-linear (Barton & North, 2001;Peñuelas et al, 1995). Although a few reports deal with both seasonal and short-term variations in the PRI-ɛ relationship (Nakaji et al, 2005(Nakaji et al, , 2006Nakanishi et al, 2006), our results indicate that the relationship could be expressed as nonlinear regression function when the data in all sky conditions and both time-scales are analyzed.…”
Section: Relationship Of ɛ and Single Indexmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…The photochemical reflectance index (PRI; Gamon et al 1992) is one main indices used for this purpose. Nakanishi et al (2006) investigated the relationship between the PRI and LUE using HSSR data and flux data collected at the KEW site (Japanese cypress forest), and revealed the effects of phenology and light intensity. Nakaji et al (2008Nakaji et al ( , 2014 also investigated relationships between several vegetation indices (including PRI) and LUE using HSSR data and flux data collected at the TMK, KEW, and TSE sites, and the Pasoh site in Malaysia.…”
Section: Estimation Of Gppmentioning
confidence: 99%