Abstract:During a short period, wild chimpanzees of group K in the Mahale Mountains employ a set of several techniques, including tool use, to feed on one species of termite (Pseudacanthotermes spiniger). They appear to use each technique appropriately according to phenological changes in the prey insect’s activities. The chimpanzees also ingest small pieces of soil from the tower of P. spiniger’s mound throughout the year. Geophagy presumably makes them visually and tactually aware of the phenological changes of the t… Show more
“…Sodium content was lower in our samples than in soil ingested by other primates (Hladik, 1977a, 1977b, Mahaney, Watts et al, 1990 and soil samples from salt licks (Weeks & Kirkpatrick, 1976;Emmons & Stark, 1979). Soil samples ingested by chimpanzees in the wet season in Gabon had higher quantities of potassium (and calcium) than their diet (Hladik, 1977b;Uehara, 1982).…”
Section: Evidence For Geophagy As Mineral Supplementmentioning
The golden-faced saki monkey Pithecia pithecia chrysocephala (Cebidae, Primates) was observed eating soil from termite nests during a long-term study of a family group in a Central Amazonian forest fragment. In this paper we describe the behaviour involved in the geophagy in these monkeys, and the results of geochemical and physical analyses of the termite nest material, as well as root mat and topsoil samples below the trees, in order to clarify the possible reasons for it. The sakis ate soil from nine arboreal termite nests on 26 soil feeding-bouts (in 853 observation hours); 25 soil feeding-bouts occurred in March 1987 (rainy season), during 19 days or 132 observation hours, and occupied 0.7% of the feeding time. Geophagy frequencies did not differ between sexes (17 feeding-bouts of four females and 8 for two males). Mineral composition was higher in arboreal termitaria than in the topsoil. Kaolinite was the major clay component. Tannin adsorptive capacity, tested through a modi®ed radial diffusion method of Hagerman, was around 10±20%, similar to a control with kaolin (10±20%), but lower than bentonite or celite (30±45%). The observations reported here, although inconclusive as to the function of geophagy in this species, indicate that it is not a mineral supplement during times of scarcity or high consumption of leaves, as has been reported for other primates, nor that it is related to fruit consumption (redressing possible mineral imbalance), as has been suggested for some other frugivorous mammals. Our results do not rule out tannin adsorptive hypothesis for the ingestion of clays, but, being an irregular habit, we argue that it is most likely related to rare and occasional dietary components.
“…Sodium content was lower in our samples than in soil ingested by other primates (Hladik, 1977a, 1977b, Mahaney, Watts et al, 1990 and soil samples from salt licks (Weeks & Kirkpatrick, 1976;Emmons & Stark, 1979). Soil samples ingested by chimpanzees in the wet season in Gabon had higher quantities of potassium (and calcium) than their diet (Hladik, 1977b;Uehara, 1982).…”
Section: Evidence For Geophagy As Mineral Supplementmentioning
The golden-faced saki monkey Pithecia pithecia chrysocephala (Cebidae, Primates) was observed eating soil from termite nests during a long-term study of a family group in a Central Amazonian forest fragment. In this paper we describe the behaviour involved in the geophagy in these monkeys, and the results of geochemical and physical analyses of the termite nest material, as well as root mat and topsoil samples below the trees, in order to clarify the possible reasons for it. The sakis ate soil from nine arboreal termite nests on 26 soil feeding-bouts (in 853 observation hours); 25 soil feeding-bouts occurred in March 1987 (rainy season), during 19 days or 132 observation hours, and occupied 0.7% of the feeding time. Geophagy frequencies did not differ between sexes (17 feeding-bouts of four females and 8 for two males). Mineral composition was higher in arboreal termitaria than in the topsoil. Kaolinite was the major clay component. Tannin adsorptive capacity, tested through a modi®ed radial diffusion method of Hagerman, was around 10±20%, similar to a control with kaolin (10±20%), but lower than bentonite or celite (30±45%). The observations reported here, although inconclusive as to the function of geophagy in this species, indicate that it is not a mineral supplement during times of scarcity or high consumption of leaves, as has been reported for other primates, nor that it is related to fruit consumption (redressing possible mineral imbalance), as has been suggested for some other frugivorous mammals. Our results do not rule out tannin adsorptive hypothesis for the ingestion of clays, but, being an irregular habit, we argue that it is most likely related to rare and occasional dietary components.
“…Chimpanzees seem to restrict their termite-fishing technique to one species (Macrotermes subhyalinus) [5,9,20], except for one observation on Pseudacanthotermes spiniger [6], These species are re stricted to the savanna area and are absent in the Ta'i forest. Tat chimpanzees were never observed to fish for any termite species, al though they feed on 5 species of termites without the help of tools (Macrotermes ivorensis are present but, with openings meters away, possess a very different structure of their underground mounds than M. subhya linus and my own efforts to fish them were never successful).…”
Section: Cross-population Comparison O F Tool Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Comparing them with observations made on wild chim panzees in the Mahale Mountains National Park [3][4][5][6] and in the Gombe Stream Na tional Park [2,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13], These latter two sites are located in a savanna/woodland region. (3) Trying to understand some of the factors affecting tool use and tool making by wild chimpanzees.…”
Reported incidences of tool use and tool making for three wild chimpanzee populations increase from Mahale (12 and 3 types of use and making, respectively), Gombe (16 and 3) to Taï (19 and 6). Sticks are commonly used and prepared at all three sites. However, Taï chimpanzees seem to perform more modifications on the material before using it. They are also the only chimpanzees seen to pound objects with tools and to combine two different tool uses to get access to one food item. Tool making is the rule for abundant material (grass, twigs), but appears to be rarer for scarce, hard material (clubs, stones). Factors involved in the acquisition and the benefit of tool use are discussed along with factors affecting the frequency and complexity of tool making in chimpanzees.
“…For example, chimpanzees modify and use stick tools to extract termites (Sanz et al, 2004;Wright et al, 2009;Yamagiwa and Basabose, 2009) and different tools to obtain pith and leaves (Malenky and Wrangham, 1994;Wrangham et al, 1998;Yamakoshi, 1998;Basabose, 2002). Modern chimpanzees extract invertebrates regularly (Uehara 1982;Nishida and Uehara 1983;Sanz et al, 2004;Sch€ oning et al, 2008;Bogart and Pruetz, 2010;O'Malley and Power, 2014), and may fall back on them when ripe fruits are scarce (Yamagiwa and Basabose, 2009). In this study, we focus on another lineage of large-brained, tool-using primates with high levels of sensorimotor cognition-capuchin monkeys (Parker and Gibson, 1977;Ottoni and Izar, 2008).…”
Invertebrate foraging patterns are not uniform. Caterpillar consumption is consistent with a preferred strategy, whereas capuchins appear to fallback on invertebrates requiring high handling time. Capuchins are convergent with hominins in possessing large brains and high levels of sensorimotor intelligence, thus our research has broad implications for primate evolution, including factors shaping cognitive innovations, brain size, and the role of entomophagy in the human diet.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.