1989
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9422(89)80110-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal changes in carbohydrate content and frost resistance of leaves of Nothofagus species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in agreement with all previous studies supporting the GLH, we found that osmotically inactive starch, and not soluble sugars, was the component responsible for the major variation in NSC with elevation. The trend found of increasing NSC towards treeline thus, cannot be directly related to freezing avoidance or tolerance, although starch can be hydrolysed to provide free sugars for increased freezing resistance in adult trees (Alberdi et al. , 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in agreement with all previous studies supporting the GLH, we found that osmotically inactive starch, and not soluble sugars, was the component responsible for the major variation in NSC with elevation. The trend found of increasing NSC towards treeline thus, cannot be directly related to freezing avoidance or tolerance, although starch can be hydrolysed to provide free sugars for increased freezing resistance in adult trees (Alberdi et al. , 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in agreement with all previous studies supporting the GLH, we found that osmotically inactive starch, and not soluble sugars, was the component responsible for the major variation in NSC with elevation. The trend found of increasing NSC towards treeline thus, cannot be directly related to freezing avoidance or tolerance, although starch can be hydrolysed to provide free sugars for increased freezing resistance in adult trees (Alberdi et al, 1989). However, as frost may occur year-round at temperate treelines and the trees were sampled towards the end of the growing season (when trees should be prepared for frosts), the starch accumulation found in the current study seems to be more a consequence of the increase in carbon reserves following the stronger limitation of growth processes than the consequence of carbon gain.…”
Section: New Phytologistmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Appendix 3 A Maximum frost resistance (FR, Bravo et al 2001Bravo et al 2001Alberdi & Rios 1983Alberdi & Rios 1983Steubing et al 1983Steubing et al 1983Steubing et al 1983Steubing et al 1983Steubing et al 1983Alberdi et al 1989Alberdi et al 1989Alberdi et al 1990Alberdi et al 1989Alberdi et al 1989Alberdi et al 1989Alberdi et al 1989Alberdi et al 1989Alberdi et al 1989Alberdi et al 1990Nobel 1982Nobel 1982Nobel 1982Piper et al 2005Piper et al 2005Nobel 1982Goldstein et al 1985Goldstein et al 1985Goldstein et al 1985Goldstein et al 1985Goldstein et al 1985Squeo et al 1991Squeo et al 1996Squeo et al 1996 -4.7 -13.3 -10.9 -13.9 -11.1 -9.0 -12. 0 -18.8 -12.0 -9.3 -8.5 -10.8 -14.2 -12.3 -20.0 -19.0 -12.0 -16.3 -20.0 -11.3 -12.3 -8.0 -14.3 -11.3 -10.5 -10.6 -10.0 -11.9 -11.0 -20.…”
Section: Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matrix of correlation coefficients for hardiness, total carbohydrates, and individual sugars. leaves and stems of other genera (Alberdi et al, 1989;Alden and Hermann, 1971;Ashworth et al, 1993;Kandler and Hopf, 1980;Khalafalla and Palzkill, 1990;Lasheen and Chaplin, 1977;O'NeilI, 1983), the seasonal changes in TSS among Forsythia taxa buds were not correlated with fluctuations in flower bud hardiness (Table 2). This and the lack of starch in nonacclimated and acclimated buds is also typical of peach flower buds (Layne and Ward, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In leaves and bark tissues of most plants, this increase arises concomitant with the hydrolysis of starch reserves. (Alberdi et al, 1989;Ashworth et al, 1993;Kandler and Hopf, 1980;Khalafalla and Palzkill, 1990;O'Neill, 1983), although some exceptions have been reported (Alden and Hermann, 1971;Ristic and Ashworth, 1993). However, hardiness-related changes in the carbohydrates of flower buds have not been documented for species other than peach [Prunus persica (L) Batsch] (Durner, 1989;Durner and Gianfagna, 1991;Lasheen and Chaplin, 1977;Layne and Ward, 1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%