2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2017.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal carbon uptake rates of phytoplankton in the northern East/Japan Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
45
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
9
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the average daily carbon uptake rate in this study, the estimated annual primary production in the UB and NES was 284 g C m −2 y −1 and 147 g C m −2 y −1 , respectively. The annual production in both regions during our research period is consistent with previous studies in the UB (273 g C m −2 y −1 and 280 g C m −2 y −1 ) (Kwak et al, 2013;Joo et al, 2014) and in the northern EJS (159 g C m −2 y −1 ), including the NES regions (Lee et al, 2017b). The annual primary production in the UB (a deep basin with a water depth > 2,000 m) was markedly higher than that in oceanic regions and other basins deeper than 200 m, whereas the annual primary production in the NES was similar to that in these regions.…”
Section: Difference In the Carbon Uptake Rate Between The Ub And Nessupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the average daily carbon uptake rate in this study, the estimated annual primary production in the UB and NES was 284 g C m −2 y −1 and 147 g C m −2 y −1 , respectively. The annual production in both regions during our research period is consistent with previous studies in the UB (273 g C m −2 y −1 and 280 g C m −2 y −1 ) (Kwak et al, 2013;Joo et al, 2014) and in the northern EJS (159 g C m −2 y −1 ), including the NES regions (Lee et al, 2017b). The annual primary production in the UB (a deep basin with a water depth > 2,000 m) was markedly higher than that in oceanic regions and other basins deeper than 200 m, whereas the annual primary production in the NES was similar to that in these regions.…”
Section: Difference In the Carbon Uptake Rate Between The Ub And Nessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Recently, the EJS, including the UB, has experienced notable changes in its physicochemical properties, such as drastic increases in sea surface temperature and rapid ocean acidification (Kim et al, 2001;Kang et al, 2003). These changes could accompany variations in biological characteristics, especially in phytoplankton communities and, subsequently, upper trophic levels (Chiba et al, 2012;Kang et al, 2017;Lee et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study suggested that large phytoplankton communities are the major contributors to primary production in the Ulleung Basin. Similarly, Legendre et al (1992) reported that primary production in the high-latitude Arctic region waters, in general, was dominated by large phytoplankton cells…”
Section: Small and Large Phytoplankton Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It has been reported that a reduction in SIC would facilitate photosynthetic activity and increase CO 2 intake by the seas (Anderson and Kaltin, 2001;Bates et al, 2006;Kahru et al, 2016). Apparently, it can cause a relative decline in the contribution by algae growing within the sea ice (Subba Rao and Platt, 1984;Legendre et al, 1992;Gosselin et al, 1997), although the sea ice community contributes less than 10 % to the total amount of Arctic Ocean C sequestration (Clasby et al, 1973;Horner and Schrader, 1982). A detailed study conducted on the interannual variations in SIC and primary production by Kahru et al (2016) suggested that primary production is enhanced with a decline in SIC.…”
Section: Sea Ice and Small Phytoplankton Primary Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling and analysis of total chl-a and POC concentrations were conducted based on Lee et al [19]. Water samples for the total chl-a and POC concentrations of phytoplankton were collected from the surface layer using a rosette sampler with Niskin bottles.…”
Section: Study Area and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%