2011
DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal and spatial variations of Southern Ocean diapycnal mixing from Argo profiling floats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
94
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
94
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, diapycnal diffusivity from turbulent mixing in the open ocean thermocline only ranges from 5 × 10 −6 to 3 × 10 −5 m 2 s −1 (Gregg, 1998;Polzin et al, 1995). Therefore, it has been argued that elevated turbulent mixing concentrated over rough topography (Ledwell et al, 2000;Wu et al, 2011) would aid in explaining this discrepancy. In the past decade, elevated diapycnal diffusivities, i.e., O (10 −4 m 2 s −1 ) or higher, have been found in mixing hotspots such as seamounts (Carter et al, 2006;Lueck and Mudge, 1997), ridges (Klymak et al, 2006a;Lee et al, 2006), and canyons (Carter and Gregg, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, diapycnal diffusivity from turbulent mixing in the open ocean thermocline only ranges from 5 × 10 −6 to 3 × 10 −5 m 2 s −1 (Gregg, 1998;Polzin et al, 1995). Therefore, it has been argued that elevated turbulent mixing concentrated over rough topography (Ledwell et al, 2000;Wu et al, 2011) would aid in explaining this discrepancy. In the past decade, elevated diapycnal diffusivities, i.e., O (10 −4 m 2 s −1 ) or higher, have been found in mixing hotspots such as seamounts (Carter et al, 2006;Lueck and Mudge, 1997), ridges (Klymak et al, 2006a;Lee et al, 2006), and canyons (Carter and Gregg, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Generally, microstructure measurements are fewer and more difficult than the fine-structure measurements (e.g., CTD and ADCP measurements), especially microstructure measurements in the deep sea. Therefore, to study the spatial and temporal distribution of turbulent mixing, researchers often resort to fine-scale parameterizations (Jing and Wu, 2010;Tian et al, 2009;Wu et al, 2011). In addition, fine-scale parameterizations would provide a reference for modelers.…”
Section: -D Shang Et Al: Spatial Distribution Of Turbulent Mixingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models of extreme simplification, while they can illuminate individual mechanisms, also discount the composite and complex essence of ocean observations. General circulation models used within a least-squares framework a priori provide a suitable framework to avoid misinterpreting observations (e.g., aliased small-scale signals) while taking advantage of complementary data sets (e.g., altimetry) and constraints (e.g., atmospheric reanalyses) to infer large-scale ocean balances and diagnose ocean variability (see Wunsch and Heimbach, 2013, for a review). However, the few publications that followed this approach to infer turbulent transport parameters (Stammer, 2005;Ferreira et al, 2005;Liu et al, 2012) provide little, if any, evaluation of the method and its results.…”
Section: G Forget Et Al: On the Observability Of Turbulent Transpormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the vast collection of in situ profiles provided by Argo (Roemmich et al, 1999(Roemmich et al, , 2009) may offer new opportunities to infer turbulent transport rates from the sea surface to 2000 m depth. Inferences of diffusivities is possible through the analysis of Argo variance fields combined with conceptual turbulence models (Wu et al, 2011;Whalen et al, 2012;Cole et al, 2015). The extensive observation of the broad-scale hydrography characteristics by Argo may also provide a basis for the inversion of turbulent transport rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a model study, Watanabe and Hibiya [2008] showed that most of the wind-induced near-inertial energy flux (hereafter denoted by WNEF) fed into the ocean interior is dissipated within the top 1000 m depth. Using high-resolution hydrographic profiles from Argo floats, Wu et al [2011] found that the seasonal variation of diapycnal mixing at a depth of 1500 m in the Southern Ocean can be largely attributed to the seasonal cycle of the WNEF over smooth topography. Their results are similar to Jing and Wu [2010] from a northwestern Pacific section at 137 E. However, in the subtropical northwestern Pacific and at Station ALOHA near Hawaii Ridge, turbulent mixing forced by wind work on near inertial motions was found to be confined within the upper 600 m [Jing and Wu, 2013;Jing et al, 2011].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%