2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-020-04462-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal and El Niño Southern Oscillation-driven variations in isotopic and elemental patterns among estuarine primary producers: implications for ecological studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we have used most data from the study area and similar periods, we also utilized stomach content data from the literature, as proxy of the diet of some local species, which did not allow a direct comparison between methods (SCA and SIA), but rather a complementary approach. In addition, we decided not to apply the models to quantify the source importance in isotope approach (e.g., bayesian mixing model), given that our sampling did not take into account some of the known basal sources and benthic invertebrates, which could lead to potential misinterpretation of our results and conclusion as reported by [ 96 ]. Therefore, the results presented here are not intended to exhaustively describe the trophic dynamic of the study, but, despite their limitations, we were able to identify the predator and prey groups with major roles in the food-web, and how they could influence the ecosystem trophic dynamic in response to the shrimp fishery in Sirinhaém, northeast Brazil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we have used most data from the study area and similar periods, we also utilized stomach content data from the literature, as proxy of the diet of some local species, which did not allow a direct comparison between methods (SCA and SIA), but rather a complementary approach. In addition, we decided not to apply the models to quantify the source importance in isotope approach (e.g., bayesian mixing model), given that our sampling did not take into account some of the known basal sources and benthic invertebrates, which could lead to potential misinterpretation of our results and conclusion as reported by [ 96 ]. Therefore, the results presented here are not intended to exhaustively describe the trophic dynamic of the study, but, despite their limitations, we were able to identify the predator and prey groups with major roles in the food-web, and how they could influence the ecosystem trophic dynamic in response to the shrimp fishery in Sirinhaém, northeast Brazil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the δ 15 N and δ 13 C averages of all seasons in the models, which removed the monthly differences of the isotopic values. In the future, sampling phytoplankton and detritus 2 months before the initial fish sampling will help resolve differences in isotopic turnover between producers and consumers (Vander Zanden and Rasmussen, 2001;Lanari et al, 2021;Possamai et al, 2021) and provide the opportunity to apply the MixSIAR models using early and late season averages to better resolve pathways (as we did with Mysis and zooplankton models).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The invertebrate samples were divided into Early Season (May-July) and Late Season (August-October) because zooplankton isotopic turnover is a few weeks (Emery et al, 2015) -zooplankton tissues reflect consumption from 1 to 2 weeks before collection. Isotopic turnover for juvenile fish, however, is from 1 to 3 months (Oliveira et al, 2017;Hernández-Urcera et al, 2022), and this time lag between consumption and consumer isotopic assimilation must be considered in the models for more reliable results (Vander Zanden and Rasmussen, 2001;Hussey et al, 2014;Lanari et al, 2021;Possamai et al, 2021).…”
Section: Estimating Pelagic × Benthic Contributions To Fish and Inver...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, environmental fluctuations cause temporal variability in the isotopic values of marine primary producers due to changes in the nutrient availability [ 23 25 ]. These dynamics may produce bias both in the interpretation in diet outputs of isotope mixing models for one consumer [ 26 ] and in the assessment of trophic levels in a community [ 27 ]. Most animals move across certain areas when foraging, and/or face seasonal fluctuations in resource availability and/or experience ontogenetic diet shifts during their lifespan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%