1990
DOI: 10.1051/alr:1990029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal activities of female barbelBarbus barbus(L.) in the River Ourthe (Southern Belgium), as revealed by radio tracking

Abstract: Two female barbel Rurbus barhu.c (L.) werc taggcd with implantable radio transmitters and tracked in thc Ourthe River (Southern Helgium) from April 12th to July 7th, 1989 to study their movements and activity rhythms during thc spring-summer pcriod. Both barbcls defined a 1.6 km home rangc and occupicd four residencc arcas. Greatest avcrage daily movcmcnts within thc home range limits occurrcd during the prcspawning and spawning periods and were associatcd with variations of mean daily water tempcrature and le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
38
0
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples were named according to their location and, within each location, were ranked by decreasing sizes, for example, Fréchoux1, Fréchoux2, etc. Samples from the different seasons taken at a particular location may not be comparable because (i) concerted population movements have previously been inferred from significant temporal variations in introgression (Chenuil et al, 2000) and (ii) migrations for reproduction are suspected in this hybrid zone (unpublished field and microsatellite data from spawning individuals) and were proven for B. barbus in other rivers (Hunt and Jones, 1974;Baras and Cherry, 1990;Lucas and Batley, 1996). Therefore, despite small female sample sizes, we were unable to analyse larger samples by pooling different dates for each location.…”
Section: Samples and Locationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Samples were named according to their location and, within each location, were ranked by decreasing sizes, for example, Fréchoux1, Fréchoux2, etc. Samples from the different seasons taken at a particular location may not be comparable because (i) concerted population movements have previously been inferred from significant temporal variations in introgression (Chenuil et al, 2000) and (ii) migrations for reproduction are suspected in this hybrid zone (unpublished field and microsatellite data from spawning individuals) and were proven for B. barbus in other rivers (Hunt and Jones, 1974;Baras and Cherry, 1990;Lucas and Batley, 1996). Therefore, despite small female sample sizes, we were unable to analyse larger samples by pooling different dates for each location.…”
Section: Samples and Locationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We investigate whether or not there are any differences at these loci between the sexes. We expected to find such differences because (i) an experimental cross between B. barbus and B. meridionalis (Philippart and Berrebi, 1990) revealed that hybrid dysgenesis (ie endogenous selection, independent of environment and attributed to the rupture of coadapted gene complexes) strongly varies among sexes, and (ii) there is direct evidence that dispersal patterns are different between male and female barbel (Baras and Cherry, 1990). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the common barbel (Barbus barbus) and nase (Chondrostoma nasus), which move between their resting habitats and feeding habitats on a daily basis (Baras 1997), as well as move seasonally to upstream spawning habitats (Baras & Cherry 1990;Huber & Kirchhofer 1998;Ovidio & Philippart 2008), habitat complementation is an important consideration. Indeed, numbers of these gregarious species in human-impacted rivers are dwindling, due in no small part to insufficient and unreachable spawning and nursery habitats (Maier 1997;Bo€ et et al 1999;Penczak & Kruk 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal variations in the migration rate of fish in rivers (Godoy, 1959(Godoy, , 1967(Godoy, , 1975Bonetto & Pignalberi, 1964;Bonetto et al, 1971;Petrere Jr., 1985;Quirós, 1988;Agostinho et al, 1993) and in fish ladders (Malmqvist, 1980;Baras & Cherry, 1990;Mallen-Cooper, 1999), and the accumulation of migrating fish immediately downstream from the barrier to migration are well documented (Mallen-Cooper, 1999;Taylor et al, 2001;Gehrke et al, 2002, among many others). However, studies of the motivations that lead neotropical species to ascend passage mechanisms are rare (Capeleti & Petrere Jr., 2006;Pompeu & Martinez, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%