1999
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Season- and size-dependent risk taking in juvenile coho salmon: experimental evaluation of asset protection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
26
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
26
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the fish were not stimulated by any predator models during trials, and thus the conclusion that state-dependent safety is of large importance for the trout fry behavior may be less valid when individuals perceive direct predation risk. Other studies have shown that salmonid juveniles (slightly larger than our trout, and thus with more energy reserves) rely on asset protection, i.e., larger fish take fewer risks, when directly attacked by model predators (Reinhardt and Healey 1999). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It should be noted that the fish were not stimulated by any predator models during trials, and thus the conclusion that state-dependent safety is of large importance for the trout fry behavior may be less valid when individuals perceive direct predation risk. Other studies have shown that salmonid juveniles (slightly larger than our trout, and thus with more energy reserves) rely on asset protection, i.e., larger fish take fewer risks, when directly attacked by model predators (Reinhardt and Healey 1999). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Actively feeding and satiated individuals may North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28: [1529][1530][1531][1532][1533][1534][1535][1536][1537][1538][1539][1540]2008 Ó Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 2008 DOI: 10.1577/M07-120.1 [Article] have a higher risk of predation (Lankford et al 2001). Large individuals may self-limit future growth potential through adoption of low-risk feeding behaviors (Reinhardt and Healey 1999). In some circumstances, there may be no single ''best'' size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This principle occurs in many animal systems. For example, in juvenile salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) the negative correlation between body size and risk taking is an example of asset protection, whereby larger animals assume less predation risk to protect their greater accumulated fitness value (Reinhardt and Healey, 1999). Also, future fitness has important consequences for variation in a risky behaviour such as helping effort in eusocial wasps (Field and Cant, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%