2014
DOI: 10.1071/an13247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Season and reproductive status rather than genetics factors influence change in ewe weight and fat over time. 1. Analysis of crossbred ewes

Abstract: The Australian sheep industry has historically made rapid advances in the quality and quantity of meat and wool through genetic improvement, but unfortunately, maternal performance, i.e. number of lambs weaned, is well below desired levels. The aim of the present paper is to investigate the potential to select for increased weight and fat across the production cycle to improve maternal performance. The analysis explores the potential to improve the weight and fat score of breeding ewes during ‘tough’ periods (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in BR mobilization rate was expected because of the classical related higher energy requirements for ewes suckling multiple litters. Similar effects of litter size on BR losses during pregnancy and suckling had been previously reported when considering BCS differences between some physiological stages (3,20,28,30). However, the decrease in BR accretion rate with the increase in litter size conflicted with previous results showing higher BR accretion in ewes with higher litter size (3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The increase in BR mobilization rate was expected because of the classical related higher energy requirements for ewes suckling multiple litters. Similar effects of litter size on BR losses during pregnancy and suckling had been previously reported when considering BCS differences between some physiological stages (3,20,28,30). However, the decrease in BR accretion rate with the increase in litter size conflicted with previous results showing higher BR accretion in ewes with higher litter size (3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This is particularly true for ruminants, for which future farming systems are expected to rely mostly on grasslands and rangelands. It is well known that some typical physiological and environmentally driven factors have an effect on BR dynamics as reported by the analysis of the relationships between various ewe-rearing performances (PERF) or mothering abilities and their body condition (Walkom et al, 2014a(Walkom et al, , 2014bWalkom and Brown, 2017). Walkom and Brown (2017) reported very strong correlations between measurements across the production cycle for BW and BCS along with weak genetic relationships of BW and BCS change traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the existing genetic variability for energetic body reserve traits previously reported in sheep (BANOS et al 2005;WALKOM et al 2014a;MACÉ et al 2018), the aim of the present study was to provide the first characterization of the genetic architecture that controls body condition in productive ewes. This was achieved by a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of a set of body reserve (BR) traits measured at key physiological stages of the productive cycle in Romane ewes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2014), depending on the breed and the physiological stage of the measurement (K oenen et al . 2001; W alkom et al . 2014a; M acé et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%