1984
DOI: 10.1029/jb089ib12p09885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasat altimetry, the North Atlantic geoid, and evaluation by shipborne subsatellite profiles

Abstract: A geological evaluation of geoid anomalies over the North Atlantic is presented with emphasis on short (40–300 km) wavelength undulations mapped by Seasat radar altimetry. Long (≥3000 km) and intermediate (300–3000 km) wavelength undulations constrain subcrustal processes and are briefly reviewed. Portions of three Seasat revolutions (revs) totaling 9300 km were followed by research ship, which measured gravity, magnetics, topography, and for a 800‐km segment also seismic reflection data, to form a ground trut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, all wavelengths shorter than 35 km are unlikely to contain any significant information and can be filtered out. This is in agreement with the estimate of 30-50 km derived by Vogt et al [1984] from a comparison of surface gravity and altimetry data in the northwestern Atlantic.…”
Section: Geoid Profile Spectrasupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In conclusion, all wavelengths shorter than 35 km are unlikely to contain any significant information and can be filtered out. This is in agreement with the estimate of 30-50 km derived by Vogt et al [1984] from a comparison of surface gravity and altimetry data in the northwestern Atlantic.…”
Section: Geoid Profile Spectrasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Should we have access to detailed bathymetric data, we could hope to extract the admittance functions and to sort out the thermomechanical parameters of the various lithospheric provinces. This has been done for ship gravity and bathymetric data by McKenzie and Bowin [1976], followed by Watts [1978] Louden and Forsyth [1982], and others. In the case of Seasat data it is quite rare to have access to bathymetric data of good accuracy precisely below the satellite tracks.…”
Section: Bathymetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where shipboard bathymetric data are not available (corresponding to most of the mapped fracture zones), fracture zones are most readily identified in the free‐air gravity anomaly field [ Smith and Sandwell , 1997] (Figure 3). Fracture zones were mapped at local minima of the free‐air gravity anomaly data (gravity troughs) [ Vogt et al , 1984]. Minimum values are up to 30 mGal lower at interpreted fracture zones than in the adjacent crust.…”
Section: Analysis Of Upper Crustal Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, subsidence rates calculated using DBDB5 were found to be quite similar to the subsidence rates using ship tracks. This is despite the fact that individual locations can display significant discrepancies between ship track bathymetry and DBDB5 bathymetry [Hayes, 1991;Smith and Wessel, 1990;Vogt et al, 1984]. This study focuses on the ship swath data for our interpretations, using the South Atlantic DBDB5 data for additional estimates of segmentation where ship track data are unavailable.…”
Section: Flowline Swathsmentioning
confidence: 99%