Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, 12-14 August 2013 2013
DOI: 10.1190/urtec2013-027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Searching for the Optimal Well Spacing in the Eagle Ford Shale: A Practical Tool-Kit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wells might show an increase in water production and an increase or decrease in oil or gas production (Lawal et al 2013;Kurtoglu and Salman 2015). In addition, pressure testing on pad wells is often utilized to identify the well interference (Portis et al 2013;Sardinha et al 2014;Sani et al 2015;Scott et al 2015). Also, microseismic monitoring can be combined with the pressure test to improve understanding the well interference (Grossi et al 2015;Lehmann et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wells might show an increase in water production and an increase or decrease in oil or gas production (Lawal et al 2013;Kurtoglu and Salman 2015). In addition, pressure testing on pad wells is often utilized to identify the well interference (Portis et al 2013;Sardinha et al 2014;Sani et al 2015;Scott et al 2015). Also, microseismic monitoring can be combined with the pressure test to improve understanding the well interference (Grossi et al 2015;Lehmann et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any well interference through the matrix in shale formations with ultralow permeability is more limited than that occurring through connecting fractures (Awada et al 2016). Although numerous pressure tests in the field have proven the existence of well interference (Portis et al 2013;Sardinha et al 2014;Sani et al 2015;Scott et al 2015), relatively few physical models exist to quantitatively simulate and explain the pressure response of shut-in wells. Marongiu-Porcu et al (2016) presented a state-of-the-art workflow by combining a complex fracture model, reservoir simulation, and geomechanics model to simulate complex fracture geometry, well performance, and stress properties to minimize undesired fracture hits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These datasets are described in detail and related back to geologic and geophysical data by Portis et al, (2013) and will be described only briefly in this section.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper will build upon the well spacing toolkit described by Portis et al, (2013), including pressure monitoring during and after completions, as well as chemical and RA tracer data to constrain the extent of conductive fractures predicted by analysis of microseismic data and fracture modeling. Predictions of conductive fracture height growth will be confirmed by application of oil geochemical analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interwell communication can be portrayed as "pressure sinks" that interfere with induced fracture effectiveness, and might affect unconventional EOR methods efficacy if they are overridden or not accounted for. For instance, numerous documented studies have demonstrated fracture interference occurrence and assessed this phenomenon in unconventional reservoirs (Ambrose et al, 2011;Manchanda et al, 2013;Portis et al, 2013;Sardinha et al, 2014;Sani et al, 2015;Awada et al, 2016;Morales et al, 2016;Klenner et al, 2018;Seth et al, 2018;Yu and Sepehrnoori, 2018). The current interest is focused on warding off negative impacts caused by fracture hits interwell propagation and affecting further productive wells.…”
Section: Motivation Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%