1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2451.1985.tb00331.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Searching for metals in the 1980s

Abstract: The past four decades have seen an unprecedented development of metal exploration techniques because as exposed and easily exploitable mineral deposits have been used up, exploration geologists have been forced to find new ways of looking deeper into the crust.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[55] for the Sun, and from refs. [57,[63][64][65] for the Earth. The Sun and Earth radii are R ≈ 6.96 × 10 10 cm and R ⊕ ≈ 6.371 × 10 8 cm, respectively.…”
Section: Density Chemical Composition and Temperature Profiles Of The...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[55] for the Sun, and from refs. [57,[63][64][65] for the Earth. The Sun and Earth radii are R ≈ 6.96 × 10 10 cm and R ⊕ ≈ 6.371 × 10 8 cm, respectively.…”
Section: Density Chemical Composition and Temperature Profiles Of The...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[58][59][60][61][62], and a temperature profile comprised of the maximum temperature of refs. [63][64][65] for any given radius. We use the maximum temperature because this will yield conservative bounds.…”
Section: Density Chemical Composition and Temperature Profiles Of The...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also necessary to determine the planets' temperature profiles. There have been multiple Earth temperature models proposed; there is not strong consensus on the matter [23,42,43]. To be conservative, we take the highest reasonable proposed temperature at all radii to construct a "maximum temperature profile" of the Earth.…”
Section: Elemental Makeupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, they are likely to be the unloading deformation caused by the stress redistribution of the slope excavation within a period of 22 days. It is noteworthy that this unloading deformation is smaller in Parts A and B but larger in Parts C and D. This is mainly because Parts A and B had become rock slopes after the excavation, while Parts C and D were still covered by thick soil deposits, so the deformation rate of the latter two is significantly slower than that of the former two (Earle, 2015). At the same time, the smaller deformation in Parts A and B is also partly due to the shotcrete support distributed in areas A and B after excavation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%