2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-016-3645-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Searching for certainty: findings predictive of appendicitis in equivocal ultrasound exams

Abstract: Loss of mural stratification, peri-appendiceal fat inflammation and an appendicolith are significant predictors of appendicitis in children with otherwise equivocal US exams. While maximum appendiceal diameter is not statistically associated with appendicitis in our study, mean appendiceal diameter of 6.7 mm in those without appendicitis suggests that the customary upper normal limit of 6 mm is too sensitive.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
18
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
18
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dalia M et al also show decrease CT usage and US as more promising image modality [ 15 ]. Andreana B et al in their retrospective analysis found average size 6.93 although sample size was small, But, in our observation upper normal value of 6 mm is probably too sensitive [ 7 , 16 , 17 ]. Among these 31 patients, the appendix was either not visualized at all (17 patients) or with secondary signs (14 patients), by the radiologist in all cases, emphasizing the importance of visualization of the appendix.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Dalia M et al also show decrease CT usage and US as more promising image modality [ 15 ]. Andreana B et al in their retrospective analysis found average size 6.93 although sample size was small, But, in our observation upper normal value of 6 mm is probably too sensitive [ 7 , 16 , 17 ]. Among these 31 patients, the appendix was either not visualized at all (17 patients) or with secondary signs (14 patients), by the radiologist in all cases, emphasizing the importance of visualization of the appendix.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Possible confounding factors, such as the length of anamnesis, chronic and/or concomitant diseases, should be excluded and analysed in a following study. In previous trials the association between the diameter of appendix and appendicitis was not found to be statistically significant (7), which would explain why the results in our study were inconclusive. The sample size of patients in whom US was performed, appendix was visualised and the diameter was measured too small for the results to be generalised on whole pediatric population, thus this issue could be addressed in a future studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…In our study, increased vascularity of the appendiceal wall (OR = 6.5; p = 0.005) and peri-appendiceal fat infiltration (OR = 3.9; p = 0.045) were significant US features associated with histologically confirmed appendicitis after surgery. Several previous studies reported similar results to those of our study for the diagnosis of appendicitis in patients with equivocal US exam findings (5,8,16,17). Lim et al (16) and Xu et al (17) reported that the presence of hyperemia in the appendiceal wall through color Doppler US was helpful to diagnose appendicitis in patients with an appendix of equivocal size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%