2018
DOI: 10.21307/stattrans-2018-006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Searching for Causes of Necrotising Enterocolitis. An Application of Propensity Matching

Abstract: Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) is a disease of the gastrointestinal tract afflicting preterm-born infants in the first few weeks of their lives. We estimate the effect of changing the feeding regimen of infants in their first 14 postnatal days by analysing the data from the UK National Neonatal Research Database. We avoid some problems with drawing causal inferences from observational data by reducing the analysis to the infants who spent the first 14 postnatal days (or longer) in neonatal care and for whom N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The supplementary file provides a detailed description of the matching process. The methods are described in the literature 37383940. Birth weight z scores are not defined for infants born less than 23 gestational weeks because there are no relevant UK reference values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supplementary file provides a detailed description of the matching process. The methods are described in the literature 37383940. Birth weight z scores are not defined for infants born less than 23 gestational weeks because there are no relevant UK reference values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods are described in the literature. [37][38][39][40] Birth weight z scores are not defined for infants born less than 23 gestational weeks because there are no relevant UK reference values. These infants were matched separately, using birth hospital level, sex, use of antenatal steroids, and birth weight (within 30 g).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%