2018
DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2018.1507856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Searching for antigenotoxic properties of marine macroalgae dietary supplementation against endogenous and exogenous challenges

Abstract: The functional characterization of marine macroalgae toward their potential to strength genome protection is still scarce. Hence, the aim of this study was to assess the antigenotoxic potential of Ulva rigida, Fucus vesiculosus, and Gracilaria species in Drosophila melanogaster following dietary exposure and adopting the somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART). All macroalgae displayed a genoprotection activity, namely against an exogenous challenge (streptonigrin). The action against subtler endogenou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, comet assay data evidenced the genoprotective potential of G. turuturu in transgenic animals, translated in the ability to reduce GDI levels to one-third compared to the non-supplemented group. In line with these results, other studies with marine macroalgae supplementation (including red seaweeds) in Drosophila melanogaster and gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) reported genoprotective effects against endogenous and exogenous challenges [46,47].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Hence, comet assay data evidenced the genoprotective potential of G. turuturu in transgenic animals, translated in the ability to reduce GDI levels to one-third compared to the non-supplemented group. In line with these results, other studies with marine macroalgae supplementation (including red seaweeds) in Drosophila melanogaster and gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) reported genoprotective effects against endogenous and exogenous challenges [46,47].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The seaweed may even have DNA protective effects in specific contexts, and the results observed in wild-type and HPV16-transgenic animals deserve further study. Currently, there is only very limited knowledge concerning the DNA protective or damaging effects of seaweeds, and some recent studies in Drosophila melanogaster suggested that some seaweed species may provide protection against different genotoxic insults [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, there are numerous published studies using D. melanogaster in antigenotoxicity analyses, and most of them are using SMARTs, especially with the wing-spot test ( Table 1). Focusing on the w/w + SMART performed for antigenotoxicity testing, there are a few studies evaluating the antigenotoxic potential of lemongrass extracts [32]; fennel plant fruit extracts [33]; red, green and brown seaweeds [3,34]; and thalassotherapy products (containing seaweeds) [35].…”
Section: Antigenotoxicity With W/w + Smartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferreira and Marques [3] and Marques and Ferreira [34] studied the exposure of D. melanogaster [Oregon-K (OK) strain] to a chronic treatment (from egg to adult eclosion) with media (Formula 4-24 ® Instant Drosophila Medium) supplemented with red, green or brown seaweeds and SN (at 20 μM). Reductions in the number of mutant ommatidia were shown in individuals cotreated with seaweed and SN in relation to the positive control.…”
Section: Antigenotoxicity With W/w + Smartmentioning
confidence: 99%