“…Starting with the flavor-changing parts of the dipole operators L dγ and L dG , we find that the calculation reproduces the known SM matching [97,98], as well as the terms proportional to the C Hud , C to the flavor-diagonal dipoles, L uγ, uG , L dγ, dG , and L eγ , are in agreement with the results of [103][104][105][106]. A subtlety appears in the case of the Q W operator for which the definition that appears in the literature [105,107,108] differs by an evanescent operator from the one used here, leading to a result that differs by a finite part. 4 For the X 3 class, we find agreement with [110] for the matching induced by C uG tt .…”