2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.89.076004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Searches forCP-violating dimension-6 electroweak gauge boson operators

Abstract: We reconsider the prospects for observing a dimension-6, CP -violating operator involving W + W − Z at the LHC. Firstly, we correct a number of earlier calculations of the loop contribution to the the neutron electric dipole moment of a companion operator, involving W + W − γ, showing that measurements imply a very strong bound on the companion operator. Secondly, we quantify the link between the two operators, showing that strongly-coupled new physics could only be observable in proposed searches if it appear… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Starting with the flavor-changing parts of the dipole operators L dγ and L dG , we find that the calculation reproduces the known SM matching [97,98], as well as the terms proportional to the C Hud , C to the flavor-diagonal dipoles, L uγ, uG , L dγ, dG , and L eγ , are in agreement with the results of [103][104][105][106]. A subtlety appears in the case of the Q W operator for which the definition that appears in the literature [105,107,108] differs by an evanescent operator from the one used here, leading to a result that differs by a finite part. 4 For the X 3 class, we find agreement with [110] for the matching induced by C uG tt .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Starting with the flavor-changing parts of the dipole operators L dγ and L dG , we find that the calculation reproduces the known SM matching [97,98], as well as the terms proportional to the C Hud , C to the flavor-diagonal dipoles, L uγ, uG , L dγ, dG , and L eγ , are in agreement with the results of [103][104][105][106]. A subtlety appears in the case of the Q W operator for which the definition that appears in the literature [105,107,108] differs by an evanescent operator from the one used here, leading to a result that differs by a finite part. 4 For the X 3 class, we find agreement with [110] for the matching induced by C uG tt .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Here we use the operator as defined inTable 2, while in parts of the literature an operator ∝ F µν W + νρ W − ρ µ was used to compute the matching onto the dipoles[105,107,108]. Note that the latter definition corresponds to the triple-gauge coupling defined in[109].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, finite 1-loop contributions can be shifted from the matching to the 4-fermion operators into the EDM operators O eB and O eW and vice versa. 8 As already mentioned, for our analysis we choose the scalar-current form for the 4-fermion operators, (L L e R )(ΨΨ). Therefore no finite one-loop contributions arise for the electron EDM from the O ledq and O leē l operators.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…generates the EDM operator for a fermion ψ [37,38]. For the case of the neutron we use the form factors of [39] and we obtain…”
Section: Bounds From Edmsmentioning
confidence: 99%