2017
DOI: 10.1177/0308022617743481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search training for people with visual field loss after stroke: A cohort study

Abstract: BackgroundPeople with visual field loss after stroke often experience difficulties in everyday activities. The purpose of this study was to assess the acceptability of search training as used within occupational therapy and the feasibility of possible measures for use in a future trial. Methods:Nine participants took part in a goal oriented intervention that was delivered three times a week for three weeks. Patient reports of acceptability and outcomes using the Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) were c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amplitudes of saccades into the BHF were smaller than into the SHF, for both left- and right-sided sHH. Turton et al (2018) [ 65 ] Cohort study n = 9HH ( n = 7, 1 right, 6 left) Quadrantanopia ( n = 1) Partial visual field loss with macular involvement ( n = 1) Ischemic stroke ( n = 6) Haemorrhage ( n = 3) Adults Participants received an intensive course of scanning and search training using various process activities and occupations. Training lasted 1 h, three times a week for 3 weeks Head movement Head yaw and pitch Increased searching on blind side, from head movement, following intervention (for n = 3 of 9) Wood et al (2011) [ 66 ] Case-control study n = 60 HH ( n = 22, 5 right, 17 left) Quadrantanopia ( n = 8) Healthy controls ( n = 30) Cerebrovascular accident ( n = 12) Tumour ( n = 2) AVM ( n = 2) Congenital brain abnormality ( n = 1) Trauma ( n = 5) Adults N/A The driving performance of each participant was assessed under in-traffic conditions along 6.3 miles of non-interstate driving in residential and commercial areas of a city.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The amplitudes of saccades into the BHF were smaller than into the SHF, for both left- and right-sided sHH. Turton et al (2018) [ 65 ] Cohort study n = 9HH ( n = 7, 1 right, 6 left) Quadrantanopia ( n = 1) Partial visual field loss with macular involvement ( n = 1) Ischemic stroke ( n = 6) Haemorrhage ( n = 3) Adults Participants received an intensive course of scanning and search training using various process activities and occupations. Training lasted 1 h, three times a week for 3 weeks Head movement Head yaw and pitch Increased searching on blind side, from head movement, following intervention (for n = 3 of 9) Wood et al (2011) [ 66 ] Case-control study n = 60 HH ( n = 22, 5 right, 17 left) Quadrantanopia ( n = 8) Healthy controls ( n = 30) Cerebrovascular accident ( n = 12) Tumour ( n = 2) AVM ( n = 2) Congenital brain abnormality ( n = 1) Trauma ( n = 5) Adults N/A The driving performance of each participant was assessed under in-traffic conditions along 6.3 miles of non-interstate driving in residential and commercial areas of a city.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Head movements were recorded in eight studies by means of a head-mounted binocular infrared video pupil tracker [ 44 , 51 , 55 ], a high-resolution accelerometer [ 63 ], digital head-worn video camera [ 65 , 66 ], a low-torque potentiometer [ 67 ] or a remote infrared system [ 45 ]. Shoulder movements were recorded in two studies by means of a video camera [ 51 , 66 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although there is a lack of conclusive evidence of effectiveness of scanning training, it is a promising technique (Pollock et al., 2011). Occupational therapists typically teach broad, horizontal scanning movements during practice of relevant ADL (Turton, 2014). Scanning training may also be administered using devices or tools, including computer-based or paper-based exercises (Pollock et al., 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%