Proceedings of 36th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2019) 2019
DOI: 10.22323/1.358.0681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for very-high-energy emission with HAWC from GW170817 event

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An impressive multiwavelength follow-up by a number of ground-and space-based observatories tracked its peculiar afterglow emission. No ∼TeV γ-rays were detected [196,198,199] for this relatively nearby (∼40 Mpc) event as the relativistic jet was observed off-axis, and none have been detected from other short-hard GRBs. Short-hard GRBs are detected more numerously at redshifts z < 1 with a mean redshift of z ≈ 0.5 in comparison to z ≈ 2 for the long-soft GRBs.…”
Section: Constraints On Shock Microphysical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An impressive multiwavelength follow-up by a number of ground-and space-based observatories tracked its peculiar afterglow emission. No ∼TeV γ-rays were detected [196,198,199] for this relatively nearby (∼40 Mpc) event as the relativistic jet was observed off-axis, and none have been detected from other short-hard GRBs. Short-hard GRBs are detected more numerously at redshifts z < 1 with a mean redshift of z ≈ 0.5 in comparison to z ≈ 2 for the long-soft GRBs.…”
Section: Constraints On Shock Microphysical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H. Abdalla 1 , H. Abe 2 , S. Abe 2 , A. Abusleme 3 , F. Acero 4 , A. Acharyya 5 , V. Acín Portella 6 , K. Ackley 7 , R. Adam 8 , C. Adams 9 , S.S. Adhikari 10 , I. Aguado-Ruesga 11 , I. Agudo 12 , R. Aguilera 13 , A. Aguirre-Santaella 14 , F. Aharonian 15 , A. Alberdi 12 , R. Alfaro 16 , J. Alfaro 3 , C. Alispach 17 , R. Aloisio 18 , R. Alves Batista 19 , J.-P. Amans 20 , L. Amati 21 , E. Amato 22 , L. Ambrogi 18 , G. Ambrosi 23 , M. Ambrosio 24 , R. Ammendola 25…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A VHE EM follow-up of GW170817 was performed by H.E.S.S., that started the observations 5.3 hr after the GW event, but no EM counterpart was found [12]. A search for a possible VHE EM counterparts has been performed also with HAWC, whose observations started ∼ 8 hr after GW170817, but no significant gamma-ray emission was found [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the flux upper limit was set for the first transit of the burst location after the trigger time [47,48]. Taking into account that the atypical multi-wavelength fluxes peaked at ∼ 120 days after the trigger time, a search for a TeV counterpart for much longer time periods than T 90 was performed, for details see [49]. The most constraining flux upper limit found was 3.37 × 10 −12 erg cm −2 s −1 for an energy range of 7 -170 TeV and the time period of 10 -110 days after the merger time.…”
Section: Grb 170817amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[50] identified 13 GRBs with similar features to GRB 170817A. Then, the search for TeV emission within days was extended to the 2 other bursts (out of the 13) in the HAWC's field of view, see [49].…”
Section: Grb 170817amentioning
confidence: 99%