1995
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(95)01224-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for the decays Bd0 → γγ and Bs0 → γγ

Abstract: General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Eqs. (9) and (12) it follows that the B → Kγγ rate vanishes for q 2 → 0. This must be so since in the limit that one of the photon energies vanishes the double photon rate does because the decay B → Kγ is forbidden.…”
Section: The B → Kγγ Matrix Element and Decay Distributionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From Eqs. (9) and (12) it follows that the B → Kγγ rate vanishes for q 2 → 0. This must be so since in the limit that one of the photon energies vanishes the double photon rate does because the decay B → Kγ is forbidden.…”
Section: The B → Kγγ Matrix Element and Decay Distributionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For B → Kγγ decays, this amounts at lowest order to expanding κ(q 2 , m 2 c ) = κ(q 2 , 0) + O(m 2 c /q 2 ), that is, using κ c = 1/2, see Eq. (9). However, in the double photon decays we cannot have q 2 large enough and hence are too close to the charm threshold to use this expansion.…”
Section: Long-distance Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other particles from the supersymmetric spectrum can further modify the Standard Model expectation [1]. The current best limit on the branching fraction for B 0 → γγ, from the L3 experiment [3] at the CERN LEP collider, is B(B 0 → γγ) < 3.9 × 10 −5 (90% confidence level). In this Letter we present an analysis based on data taken with the BABAR detector [4], which operates at the PEP-II asymmetric-energy e + e − collider at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With the choice of (m b ,Λ s ) = (5.03 GeV, 370 MeV), the resulting branching ratio (1.4 · 10 −6 ) is substantially larger than what has been stated in the literature. The present best limit on the decay B s → γγ is [20] B(B s → γγ) < 1.48 · 10 −4 ,…”
Section: Numerical Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 94%