1988
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.61.2292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for TeVγrays from SN 1987 A during December 1987 and January 1988

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Available upper limits on the TeV γ-ray flux from SN 1987A are as follows: t ≈ 10 months (November 1987) -2.3 ×10 −11 cm −2 s −1 above 1 TeV (Raubenheimer et al [12]); t ≈ 1 year -6.1×10 −12 cm −2 above 3 TeV (Bond et al [8]); t ≈ 1 year (January/February 1988) -1.6×10 −10 cm −2 s −1 above 0.4 TeV (Chadwick et al [10]). Assuming a distance of 55 kpc, and if the observer is inside the beam of energetic neutrons injected by the pulsar, which will also define the γ-ray beam, then the value of ξ −1 Ω b can be constrained by the 1 TeV upper limit mentioned above, giving ξ −1 Ω b > 0.36 sr for the case of P 0 = 5 ms (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Available upper limits on the TeV γ-ray flux from SN 1987A are as follows: t ≈ 10 months (November 1987) -2.3 ×10 −11 cm −2 s −1 above 1 TeV (Raubenheimer et al [12]); t ≈ 1 year -6.1×10 −12 cm −2 above 3 TeV (Bond et al [8]); t ≈ 1 year (January/February 1988) -1.6×10 −10 cm −2 s −1 above 0.4 TeV (Chadwick et al [10]). Assuming a distance of 55 kpc, and if the observer is inside the beam of energetic neutrons injected by the pulsar, which will also define the γ-ray beam, then the value of ξ −1 Ω b can be constrained by the 1 TeV upper limit mentioned above, giving ξ −1 Ω b > 0.36 sr for the case of P 0 = 5 ms (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young supernova remnants are probably sites of acceleration of particles to high energies and, as a result of interactions, also sources of high energy neutrinos and γ-rays [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Following the occurrence of SN1987A it was expected that high energy γ-rays would be detected from this object, but the observations have so far been negative [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Also, some models required the formation of a pulsar during the supernova (SN) explosion which has not yet been discovered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although observational efforts in the highenergy gamma-ray region were intensively carried out for several years (Raubenheimer et al 1988;Ciampa et al 1988;Bond et al 1988aBond et al ,b, 1989Allen et al 1993a,b;van Stekelenborg et al 1993;Yoshii et al 1996), no positive signals were obtained, with the possible exception of a 2-day TeV gamma-ray burst (Bond et al 1988b). No observations since 1991 have been reported, despite the fact that models predict an increasing flux of high energy gamma-rays as the SN shock wave expands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bond et al 1988), or upper limits. The possibility of detecting a periodic signal at these energies is hampered by the low sensitivity of the detectors, the low number of photon events and the background from cosmic rays and radioactive decays in the supernova remnant.…”
Section: And References Th~rein)mentioning
confidence: 99%