2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6def
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for Spatial Correlations of Neutrinos with Ultra-high-energy Cosmic Rays

Abstract: For several decades, the origin of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) has been an unsolved question of high-energy astrophysics. One approach for solving this puzzle is to correlate UHECRs with high-energy neutrinos, since neutrinos are a direct probe of hadronic interactions of cosmic rays and are not deflected by magnetic fields. In this paper, we present three different approaches for correlating the arrival directions of neutrinos with the arrival directions of UHECRs. The neutrino data are provided by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is done by calculating the local point source test statistic map and adding to it a logarithmic penalty term from the skymap. This procedure was initially developed in the context of searching for joint sources of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays and neutrinos (Albert et al 2022) and has been used to search for neutrinos coincident with ANITA events (Aartsen et al 2020e), gravitational waves (Aartsen et al 2020c), and gamma-ray bursts (Abbasi et al 2022b). We then repeat this followup procedure for every alert in our catalog and for each of the three timescales described above.…”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is done by calculating the local point source test statistic map and adding to it a logarithmic penalty term from the skymap. This procedure was initially developed in the context of searching for joint sources of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays and neutrinos (Albert et al 2022) and has been used to search for neutrinos coincident with ANITA events (Aartsen et al 2020e), gravitational waves (Aartsen et al 2020c), and gamma-ray bursts (Abbasi et al 2022b). We then repeat this followup procedure for every alert in our catalog and for each of the three timescales described above.…”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those constraints were set for particles with deflections not larger than 30 • , which implies light or intermediate composition. Indeed, the deflection of 100 EeV proton in the galactic magnetic field is approximately 3 • , when estimated as a median over all directions in the sky in either JF12 or PT11 GMF model [27]. Thus, Auger result obtained for E > 80 EeV CRs should be attributed to the observed particles with Z ≲ 8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The remaining part of the flux is, therefore, most likely extragalactic, with recent studies confirming that even the flavor composition is consistent with isotropy [44]. In order to identify its sources, the IceCube Collaboration adopts different strategies, including searches for multiplets of events from similar directions in the sky [9,[45][46][47][48], cross-correlation of neutrino angular distribution with catalogs of known sources [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] and with ultra-high-energy cosmic rays [63][64][65], the analysis of the neutrino angular power spectrum [66][67][68][69], and searches for temporal and spatial correlations with transient sources [70,71]. Up to now, the IceCube Collaboration has reported on the detection of two sources, the Seyfert galaxy NGC 1068 [10], and the blazar TXS 0506 + 056 [6,7].…”
Section: Angular Distribution and Point Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%