1997
DOI: 10.3109/00016489709124059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for Prognostic Factors in Head and Neck Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pattern and relevance of radiationinduced apoptosis in nonhematological tumors has not been well studied. Our finding of no significant levels of apoptosis induced after 2 Gy supports the results of a study on 15 patients with advanced head and neck cancers [19]. In contrast, preliminary results of a study on solid pediatric tumors suggest that the level of apoptosis induced in vitro after 2 Gy has prognostic value [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pattern and relevance of radiationinduced apoptosis in nonhematological tumors has not been well studied. Our finding of no significant levels of apoptosis induced after 2 Gy supports the results of a study on 15 patients with advanced head and neck cancers [19]. In contrast, preliminary results of a study on solid pediatric tumors suggest that the level of apoptosis induced in vitro after 2 Gy has prognostic value [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…A correlation was reported between AI following irradiation with 2 or 10 Gy in vitro and clinical response for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [18]. Another study on 15 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck showed that the level of apoptosis induced following 2 Gy irradiation was low and not prognostic for radiotherapy outcome [19]. In contrast, preliminary results of in vitro radiation-induced apoptosis after 2 Gy measured as a proportion of pretreatment apoptosis was reported as having prognostic value for pediatric solid tumors [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean age was 66.1 years (range, 49-83 years) in the good survival group, and 72.6 years (range, 59-84 years) in the poor survival group (P=0.09). The mean dose of irradiation within the first week was 12.4 Gy (range, [9][10][11][12][13][14] in the good survival group, and 11.3 Gy (range, [9][10][11][12][13][14] in the poor survival group (P=0. 19).…”
Section: Patients and Radiation Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6) Spontaneous apoptosis is a mechanism of cell loss in untreated tumors, 3) so irradiation probably enhances the process of apoptosis that results in tumor cell death in irradiated patients. [7][8][9] In human uterine cervical cancer, Ohno et al recently reported the induction of apoptosis and an apoptosisrelated protein, Bax, after irradiation therapy. 10) However, no data are available that indicate whether the induction of apoptosis in uterine cervical cancer tissue after the initial dose of irradiation therapy predicts the long-term prognosis of irradiated patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 For example, studies [12][13][14] revealed that a higher MI value is predictive for local tumor recurrence, patient survival time, and treatment response in humans with cervical SCC. In another study, 15 some human patients with head and neck SCC who had reduction of MI after the first fraction of radiation therapy had longer survival time than did patients who had increased MI. Due to the similarities between human and feline oral SCC, 16 MI could be of prognostic importance in cases of oral SCC in cats.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%