1997
DOI: 10.1007/s002880050313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for lepton flavour number violating $Z^0$ -decays

Abstract: A search for lepton avour number violating Z 0 decays in the channels Z 0 ! , Z 0 ! e , Z 0 ! e , using the DELPHI detector with data collected during the 1991{94 LEP runs, is described. No signal was found. Upper limits at 95% con dence level for the respective branching fractions of 1:2 10 5 , 2 : 2 10 5 , and 0:25 10 5 , w ere obtained.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Present Bound (90%CL) Future Sensitivity BR(µ → eγ) 4.2 × 10 −13 (MEG 2016) [24] 4 × 10 −14 (MEG-II) [25] BR(τ → eγ) 3.3 × 10 −8 (BABAR 2010) [26] 10 −9 (BELLE-II) [27] BR(τ → µγ) 4.4 × 10 −8 (BABAR 2010) [26] 10 −9 (BELLE-II) [27] BR(µ → eee) 1.0 × 10 −12 (SINDRUM 1988) [28] 10 −16 Mu3E (PSI) [29] BR(τ → eee) 2.7 × 10 −8 (BELLE 2010) [30] 10 −9,−10 (BELLE-II) [27] BR(τ → µµµ) 2.1 × 10 −8 (BELLE 2010) [30] 10 −9,−10 (BELLE-II) [27] BR(τ → µη) 2.3 × 10 −8 (BELLE 2010) [31] 10 −9,−10 (BELLE-II) [27] CR(µ − e, Au) 7.0 × 10 −13 (SINDRUM II 2006) [32] CR(µ − e, Ti) 4.3 × 10 −12 (SINDRUM II 2004) [33] 10 −18 PRISM (J-PARC) [34] CR(µ − e, Al) 3.1 × 10 −15 COMET-I (J-PARC) [35] 2.6 × 10 −17 COMET-II (J-PARC) [35] 2.5 × 10 −17 Mu2E (Fermilab) [36] BR(Z → µe) 1.7 × 10 −6 (LEP 1995) [37], 7.5 × 10 −7 (ATLAS 2014) [9] BR(Z → τ e) 9.8 × 10 −6 (LEP 1995) [37] BR(Z → τ µ) 1.2 × 10 −5 (LEP 1995) [38], 1.69 × 10 −5 (ATLAS 2014) [39] BR(H → µe) 3.6 × 10 −3 (CMS 2015) [40] BR(H → τ e) 1.04 × 10 −2 (ATLAS 2016) [39], 0.7 × 10 −2 (CMS 2015) [40] BR(H → τ µ) 1.43 × 10 −2 (ATLAS 2016) [39], 1.51 × 10 −2 (CMS 2015) [41] In this work, we consider the Inverse Seesaw (ISS) [14,[42][43][44] as a specific realization of the low scale seesaw models. In particular, the ISS extends the SM spectrum with three pairs of RH neutrinos with opposite lepton numbers and considers Majorana masses for some of these new fields, which are assumed to be naturally small since they are the only masses that violate LN.…”
Section: Lfv Observablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Present Bound (90%CL) Future Sensitivity BR(µ → eγ) 4.2 × 10 −13 (MEG 2016) [24] 4 × 10 −14 (MEG-II) [25] BR(τ → eγ) 3.3 × 10 −8 (BABAR 2010) [26] 10 −9 (BELLE-II) [27] BR(τ → µγ) 4.4 × 10 −8 (BABAR 2010) [26] 10 −9 (BELLE-II) [27] BR(µ → eee) 1.0 × 10 −12 (SINDRUM 1988) [28] 10 −16 Mu3E (PSI) [29] BR(τ → eee) 2.7 × 10 −8 (BELLE 2010) [30] 10 −9,−10 (BELLE-II) [27] BR(τ → µµµ) 2.1 × 10 −8 (BELLE 2010) [30] 10 −9,−10 (BELLE-II) [27] BR(τ → µη) 2.3 × 10 −8 (BELLE 2010) [31] 10 −9,−10 (BELLE-II) [27] CR(µ − e, Au) 7.0 × 10 −13 (SINDRUM II 2006) [32] CR(µ − e, Ti) 4.3 × 10 −12 (SINDRUM II 2004) [33] 10 −18 PRISM (J-PARC) [34] CR(µ − e, Al) 3.1 × 10 −15 COMET-I (J-PARC) [35] 2.6 × 10 −17 COMET-II (J-PARC) [35] 2.5 × 10 −17 Mu2E (Fermilab) [36] BR(Z → µe) 1.7 × 10 −6 (LEP 1995) [37], 7.5 × 10 −7 (ATLAS 2014) [9] BR(Z → τ e) 9.8 × 10 −6 (LEP 1995) [37] BR(Z → τ µ) 1.2 × 10 −5 (LEP 1995) [38], 1.69 × 10 −5 (ATLAS 2014) [39] BR(H → µe) 3.6 × 10 −3 (CMS 2015) [40] BR(H → τ e) 1.04 × 10 −2 (ATLAS 2016) [39], 0.7 × 10 −2 (CMS 2015) [40] BR(H → τ µ) 1.43 × 10 −2 (ATLAS 2016) [39], 1.51 × 10 −2 (CMS 2015) [41] In this work, we consider the Inverse Seesaw (ISS) [14,[42][43][44] as a specific realization of the low scale seesaw models. In particular, the ISS extends the SM spectrum with three pairs of RH neutrinos with opposite lepton numbers and considers Majorana masses for some of these new fields, which are assumed to be naturally small since they are the only masses that violate LN.…”
Section: Lfv Observablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…H → τ [10,11], and derived upper bounds on the off-diagonal Yukawa couplings of the order of 10 −3 . The ATLAS experiment currently provides the most stringent limit for Z → eµ [12] with BR < 7.5 × 10 −7 , while experiments at the Large Electron Positron (LEP) collider set the most stringent limits for Z → eτ (Z → µτ ) with BR < 9.8 × 10 −6 [13] (BR < 1.2 × 10 −5 [14]). Lepton colliders with their clean environment and well-understood backgrounds can outperform hadron colliders with less integrated luminosity and thus provide an ideal facility to probe rare CLFV events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to note that a relatively large Br(H → µτ) can be achieved without any particular tuning of the effective couplings, while a large Br(H → eτ) is possible only at the cost of some fine-tuning of the corresponding couplings [25]. Upper bounds on the LFV Z → eµ, Z → µτ and Z → eτ decays were set by the LEP experiments [26,27]: Br(Z → eµ) < 1.7×10 −6 , Br(Z → eτ) < 9.8×10 −6 , and Br(Z → µτ) < 1.2×10 −5 at the 95% CL. The ATLAS experiment set the most stringent upper bound on the LFV Z → eµ decays [28]: Br(Z → eµ) < 7.5 × 10 −7 at 95% CL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%