2007
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.006791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for hepatopancreatic ecdysteroid-responsive genes during the crayfish molt cycle: from a single gene to multigenicity

Abstract: SUMMARY The expression of the vitellogenin gene of the red-claw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus (CqVg) was previously demonstrated in male crayfish during an endocrinologically induced molt cycle. The hypothesis that this expression is under the direct control of ecdysteroids was tested in this study both in vivo and in vitro. Unlike vitellogenin of insects, CqVg was not found to be ecdysteroid-responsive. Thus, a multigenic approach was employed for the identification of other hepatopancreatic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 summarizes the premolt progress, presenting the relationship between the molt mineralization index (MMI), the circulating levels of ecdysteroids and the presence of a new cuticle under the existing one. It agrees with a similar relationship that was established in previous astacid studies (Nakatsuji et al, 2000;Shechter et al, 2007). Eighteen males were selected for expression analysis and were divided into seven premolt stages as follows: males at stages P1 and P2 exhibited no gastroliths, and were divided according to the time from eyestalk removal (1 day versus 4 days) and by the small difference in ecdysteroid level.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 summarizes the premolt progress, presenting the relationship between the molt mineralization index (MMI), the circulating levels of ecdysteroids and the presence of a new cuticle under the existing one. It agrees with a similar relationship that was established in previous astacid studies (Nakatsuji et al, 2000;Shechter et al, 2007). Eighteen males were selected for expression analysis and were divided into seven premolt stages as follows: males at stages P1 and P2 exhibited no gastroliths, and were divided according to the time from eyestalk removal (1 day versus 4 days) and by the small difference in ecdysteroid level.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It has to be noted that the removal of the eyestalk eliminates a variety of peptide hormones and, although inducing premolt, the moltExpression of cytoskeletal and molt-related genes is temporally scheduled in the hypodermis of the crayfish Procambarus clarkii during premolt independent physiology of the individual may be affected as well. Just before ecdysis, the level of circulating ecdysteroids is sharply decreased (Chung, 2010;Nakatsuji et al, 2000;Shechter et al, 2007). The level of two additional peptide hormones is increased from this period across ecdysis and postmolt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in crustaceans, this did not occur with diets containing purified chitin, but this chitinase activity has occurred in the basal region of the peritrophic membrane in the gut (Ceccaldi, 1989;Alexandre et al, 2014). It is likely that the same mechanism occurs in M. tenellum because chitin is re-absorbed when chitinase dissolves the old exoskeleton into a more soluble form in the integument, which is common in decapods (Dall et al, 1990;Chang, 1995;Shechter et al, 2007;Stillman et al, 2008). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous nomenclature used for E. superba is also included for comparison (Table 6.2; Buchholz, 1991). Combining morphological moult staging ( other crustaceans, for example such as in the elucidation of chitin turnoveror cuticle-digestion processes (Seear et al, 2009;Shechter et al, 2007). In turn, the morphological stage definitions may be validated and refined further in this way (see also Fig.6.1B).…”
Section: Categorisation and Timing Of Stages In The Moult Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%