2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.87.012002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for hadronic transitionχcJηcπ+πand observation ofχ

Abstract: Hadronic transitions of χ cJ → η c π + π − (J = 0, 1, 2) are searched for using a sample of 1.06 × 10 8 ψ(3686) events collected with the BESIII detector at the BEPCII storage ring. The η c is reconstructed with K 0 S K ± π ∓ and K + K − π 0 final states. No signals are observed in any of the three χ cJ states in either η c decay mode. At the 90% confidence level, the upper limits are determined to be B(χ c0 → η c π + π − ) < 0.07%, B(χ c1 → η c π + π − ) < 0.32%, and B(χ c2 → η c π + π − ) < 0.54%. The upper … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

8
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The systematic uncertainty from photon reconstruction is determined to be 1.0% for each photon by studying the control sample of J/ψ → ρ 0 π 0 decays [53]. Since it is difficult to find an appropriate control sample to estimate the systematic uncertainty related to the kinematic fit and the vertex fit, we correct the chargedtrack helix parameters of the MC simulated events [54] to obtain a better match with the data sample. The difference between the efficiency with and without the correction is taken as the uncertainty associated with the kinematic fit.…”
Section: Systematic Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic uncertainty from photon reconstruction is determined to be 1.0% for each photon by studying the control sample of J/ψ → ρ 0 π 0 decays [53]. Since it is difficult to find an appropriate control sample to estimate the systematic uncertainty related to the kinematic fit and the vertex fit, we correct the chargedtrack helix parameters of the MC simulated events [54] to obtain a better match with the data sample. The difference between the efficiency with and without the correction is taken as the uncertainty associated with the kinematic fit.…”
Section: Systematic Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study this difference, we correct the helix parameters of the charged tracks in MC simulation [29]; the difference in χ 2 distribution between data and MC simulation becomes negligibly small according to other studies [30]. We take half of the difference in the ratio of detection efficiencies ϵ sig and ϵ tot between MC simulations with and without this correction as systematic uncertainty (3.1%).…”
Section: Measurement Of the Absolute Branching Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty in π 0 reconstruction is 1% [31]. The systematic bias of the KF is estimated by using the track-parameter-correction method [33]. The correction factors for helix track parameters are determined from the control sample…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%