2014
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1407.6186
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for exclusive photoproduction of Z$_c^{\pm}$(3900) at COMPASS

C. Adolph,
R. Akhunzyanov,
M. G. Alexeev
et al.
Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation has been confirmed by the Belle Collaboration [11] and by Xiao et al using data from the CLEO-c detector [12]. However, it has not been observed in exclusive photoproduction of J/ψ, π on protons [13] or in conjunction with B 0 decays [14,15]. As a charged charmonium-like structure, it must contain at least four quarks, and tetraquark and molecular interpretations have been suggested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This observation has been confirmed by the Belle Collaboration [11] and by Xiao et al using data from the CLEO-c detector [12]. However, it has not been observed in exclusive photoproduction of J/ψ, π on protons [13] or in conjunction with B 0 decays [14,15]. As a charged charmonium-like structure, it must contain at least four quarks, and tetraquark and molecular interpretations have been suggested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…• The resonance Z + c (3900) was found in J/ψ π invariant mass only through e + e − → Y (4260) → (J/ψ π + )π − [4][5][6]. No resonant structure in J/ψ π + invariant mass was seen in B0 → (J/ψ π + )K − by BELLE [10], in B0 → (J/ψπ + )π − by LHCb [37] or in γp → (J/ψ π + )n by COMPASS [38]. This might indicate that the peak seen in e + e − → Y (4260) → (J/ψ π + )π − might not be of dynamical origin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is still unclear whether the Z c is a typical resonance, or if it only appears due to multi-channel phenomena. There is also another potential reason why Z c did not appear in our simulation; the Z + c (3900) was found only in e + e − → Y (4260) → (J/ψπ + )π − [4,5,6], but not in the decays B − 0 → (J/ψπ + )K − [10], B − 0 → (J/ψπ + )π− [23] or in γ p → (J/ψπ + )n [24]. This might indicate that the peek seen in e + e − → Y (4660) → (J/ψπ + )π − might not be of dynamical origin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%