Search for charged Higgs bosons in e+e− collisions at energies up to  GeV

Heister, A.; Schael, S.; Barate, R.; Brunelière, R.; Bonis, I. De; Décamp, D.; Goy, C.; Jézéquel, S.; Lees, J. P.; Martin, F. F.; Merle, E.; Minard, M.-N.; Pietrzyk, B.; Trocmé, B.; Boix, G.; Bravo, S.; Casado, M. P.; Chmeissani, M.; Crespo, J.M.; Fernández, E.; Fernández-Bosman, M.; Garrido, Ll.; Graugés, E.; López, J. A.; Martı́nez, M.; Merino, G.; Pacheco, A.; Paneque, D.; Ruiz, H.; Colaleo, A.; Creanza, D.; Filippis, N. De; Palma, M. De; Iaselli, G.; Mäggi, G.; Maggi, M.; Nuzzo, S.; Ranieri, A.; Raso, G.; Ruggieri, F.; Selvaggi, G.; Silvestris, L.; Tempesta, P.; Tricomi, A.; Zito, G.; Huang, X. T.; Lin, J.; Ouyang, Q.; Wang, T; Xie, Y.; Xu, R.; Xue, S.; Zhang, J; Zhang, L; Zhao, W.; Abbaneo, D.; Azzurri, P.; Barklow, T.; Buchmüller, O.; Cattaneo, M.; Cerutti, F.; Clerbaux, B.; Drevermann, H.; Forty, R.; Frank, M.; Gianotti, F.; Greening, T.C.; Hansen, J. B.; Harvey, J.; Hutchcroft, D.; Janot, P.; Jost, B.; Kado, M.; Mató, P.; Moutoussi, A.; Ranjard, F.; Rolandi, G.; Schlatter, D.; Sguazzoni, G.; Tejessy, W.; Teubert, F.; Valassi, A.; Videau, I.; Ward, J. J.; Badaud, F.; Dessagne, S.; Falvard, A.; Fayolle, D.; Gay, P.; Jousset, J.; Michel, B.; Monteil, S.; Pallin, D.; Pascolo, J.M.; Perret, P.; Hansen, J. D.; Hansen, J. R.; Hansen, P. H.; Nilsson, B.S.; Kyriakis, A.; Markou, C.; Simopoulou, E.; Vayaki, A.; Zachariadou, K.; Blondel, A.; Brient, J. C.; Machefert, F.; Rougé, A.; Swynghedauw, M.; Tanaka, R.; Videau, H.; Ciulli, V.; Focardi, E.; Parrini, G.; Antonelli, A.; Antonelli, M.; Bencivenni, G.; Bossi, F.; Capon, G.; Chiarella, V.; Laurelli, P.; Mannocchi, G.; Murtas, F.; Passalacqua, L.; Kennedy, J.; Lynch, J.G.; Negus, P.; O’Shea, V.; Thompson, A. S.; Wasserbaech, S.; Cavanaugh, R.; Dhamotharan, S.; Geweniger, C.; Hanke, P.; Hepp, V.; Kluge, E. E.; Leibenguth, G.; Putzer, A.; Stenzel, H.; Tittel, K.; Wunsch, M.; Beuselinck, R.; Cameron, W.; Davies, G.; Dornan, P. J.; Girone, M.; Hill, R. D.; Marinelli, N.; Nowell, J.; Rutherford, S.A.; Sedgbeer, J. K.; Thompson, J.; White, R.; Ghete, V. M.; Girtler, P.; Kneringer, E.; Kühn, D.; Rudolph, G.; Bouhova-Thacker, E. V.; Bowdery, C. K.; Clarke, Danielle; Ellis, G.; Finch, A. J.; Foster, F.; Hughes, G.; Jones, R. W. L.; Pearson, M. R.; Robertson, N. A.; Smižanská, M.; Aa, O. van der; Delaere, C.; Lemaı̂tre, V.; Blumenschein, U.; Hölldorfer, F.; Jakobs, K.; Kayser, F.; Kleinknecht, K.; Müller, A.‐S.; Quast, G.; Renk, B.; Sander, H. G.; Schmeling, S.; Wachsmuth, H.; Zeitnitz, C.; Ziegler, T.; Bonissent, A.; Coyle, P.; Curtil, C.; Ealet, A.; Fouchez, D.; Payre, P.; Tilquin, A.; Ragusa, F.; David, A.; Dietl, H.; Ganis, G.; Hüttmann, K.; Lütjens, G.; Männer, W.; Moser, H. G.; Settles, R.; Wolf, G.; Boucrot, J.; Callot, O.; Davier, M.; Duflot, L.; Grivaz, J.-F.; Heusse, P.; Jachołkowska, A.; Serin, L.; Veillet, J. J.; Regie, J.B. De Vivie De; Yuan, C. Z.; Bagliesi, G.; Boccali, T.; Foà, L.; Giammanco, A.; Giassi, A.; Ligabue, F.; Messineo, A.; Palla, F.; Sanguinetti, G.; Sciabà, A.; Тенчини, Р.; Venturi, A.; Verdini, P. G.; Awunor, O.; Blair, G.A.; Cowan, G.; García-Bellido, A.; Green, M.G; Jones, L.T.; Medcalf, T.; Misiejuk, A.; Strong, J. A.; Teixeira-Dias, P.; Clifft, R. W.; Edgecock, T.R.; Norton, P. R.; Tomalin, I. R.; Bloch-Devaux, B.; Boumediene, D.; Colas, P.; Fabbro, B.; Lançon, E.; Lemaire, M. C.; Locci, E.; Pérez, P.; Rander, J.; Seager, P.; Tuchming, B.; Vallage, B.; Konstantinidis, N.; Litke, A. M.; Taylor, G. N.; Booth, C.N.; Cartwright, S.; Combley, F.; Hodgson, P.; Lehto, M.; Thompson, L.F.; Böhrer, A.; Brandt, Siegmund; Grupen, C.; Heß, J.; Ngac, A.; Prange, G.; Sieler, U.; Borean, C.; Giannini, G.; He, H.; Pütz, J.; Rothberg, J.; Armstrong, S.R.; Berkelman, K.; Cranmer, K.; Ferguson, D.P.S.; Gao, Y. S.; González, S.; Hayes, O.J.; Hu, H.; Jin, S.; Kile, J.; McNamara, Peter; Nielsen, J.; Pan, Y.; Wimmersperg-Toeller, J. H. von; Wiedenmann, W.; Wu, Jian; Wu, S. L.; Wu, X.; Zobernig, G.; Dissertori, G.

doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(02)02380-8

Cited by 78 publications

(74 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Given the experimental lower bounds on m W and m S [48,49], the error on F W is irrelevant while |F S | gets enhanced by about 10% for m S = 150 GeV: since the experimental error on µ γγ is large and constructive interference of the S ± and W ± is favored by the experiment, we also assume the error involved by the above approximation for F S to be negligible. We notice also that in the limit of heavy masses for the charged scalar and vector bosons the light Higgs decay to such (virtual) states is highly suppressed by kinematics, and therefore no additional decay channels have to be taken into account besides those of the SM.…”

Section: Jhep01(2014)041mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…First, we scan the parameter space looking for data points that produce the right SM mass spectrum and satisfy the direct searches for charged particles at LEP [49] and a heavy neutral scalar at LHC [67] as well as the EW precision constraints from the S and T parameters [52][53][54]. More specifically, we impose the constraints…”

Section: Jhep01(2014)041 3 Model and Constraintsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

LHC data and aspects of new physics

Alanne

Chiara

Tuominen

2014

J. High Energ. Phys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:We consider the implications of current LHC data on new physics with strongly interacting sector(s). We parametrize the relevant interaction Lagrangian and study the best fit values in light of current data. These are then considered within a simple framework of bosonic technicolor. We consider first the effective Lagrangian containing only spin-0 composites of the underlying theory, which corresponds to a two Higgs doublet model. With respect to this baseline, the effects of the vector bosons, a staple in strong interacting theories, are illustrated by considering two cases: first, the case where the effects of the vector bosons arise only through their mixing with the electroweak SU(2) L gauge fields and, second, the case where also a direct interaction term with neutral scalars exists. We find that the case with a direct coupling of the composite vector fields to the Higgs allows the tested model to fit the experimental results with goodness comparable to that of the SM.

show abstract

Section: Jhep01(2014)041mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Jhep01(2014)041 3 Model and Constraintsmentioning

confidence: 99%

LHC data and aspects of new physics

Alanne

Chiara

Tuominen

2014

J. High Energ. Phys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Searches at LEP have set a limit M H ± > 79. 3 GeV on the mass of a charged Higgs boson in a general two-Higgs-doublet model [2]. Within the MSSM, the charged-Higgs mass is constrained by the pseudoscalar Higgs mass and the W-boson mass through M 2 H ± = M 2 A + M 2 W at tree level, with only moderate higher-order corrections [3][4][5][6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Charged-Higgs-boson production at the LHC: Next-to-leading-order supersymmetric QCD corrections

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The dominant production process for heavy charged Higgs bosons at the LHC is the associated production with heavy quarks. We have calculated the next-to-leading-order supersymmetric QCD corrections to charged-Higgs production through the parton processes qq, gg → tbH ± and present results for total cross sections and differential distributions. The QCD corrections reduce the renormalization and factorization scale dependence and thus stabilize the theoretical predictions. We present a comparison of the next-to-leadingorder results for the inclusive cross section with a calculation based on bottom-gluon fusion gb → tH ± and discuss the impact of the next-to-leading-order corrections on charged-Higgs searches at the LHC. 0

show abstract

“…Since the coupling H ±f i f j is sizably suppressed by s + , the search experiments through the top quark decay hardly give the constraints on H ± . The experimental data at the LEP gives the lower bound of the charged Higgs mass, m H ± > 79.3 GeV [69,70].…”

Section: Jhep03(2014)010mentioning

confidence: 99%

LHC diphoton and Z+photon Higgs signals in the Higgs triplet model with Y = 0

Wang

Han

2014

J. High Energ. Phys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:We study the implications of the LHC diphoton and Z+photon Higgs signals on the Higgs triplet model with Y=0, which predicts two neutral CP-even Higgs bosons h, H and a pair of charged Higgs H ± . We discuss three different scenarios: (i) the observed boson is the light Higgs boson h; (ii) it is the heavy Higgs boson H; (iii) the observed signal is from the almost degenerate h and H. We find that the inclusive Higgs diphoton rates in the first two scenarios can be enhanced or suppressed compared to the SM value, which can respectively fit the ATLAS and CMS diphoton data within 1σ range. The inclusive ZZ * rates are suppressed, which are outside 1σ range of ATLAS data and within 1σ range of CMS data. Meanwhile, another CP-even Higgs boson production rate can be suppressed enough not to be observed at the collider. For the third scenario, the Higgs diphoton rate is suppressed, which is outside 1σ range of ATLAS data, and the ZZ * rate equals to SM value approximately. In addition, we find that the two rates of h → γγ and h → Zγ have the positive correlations for the three scenarios.

show abstract

Search for charged Higgs bosons in e+e− collisions at energies up to GeV

Cited by 78 publications

References 26 publications

LHC data and aspects of new physics

LHC data and aspects of new physics

Charged-Higgs-boson production at the LHC: Next-to-leading-order supersymmetric QCD corrections

LHC diphoton and Z+photon Higgs signals in the Higgs triplet model with Y = 0

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About