1979
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(79)90038-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search for 4n IN π− double charge exchange reactions with heavy nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the sake of completeness, let us mention two special, non-conventional uses of the negative-pion probe. Earlier, in 1979, Chultem et al had proposed an original use of a π − beam in a two-step process [31]. They hoped to produce a bound tetraneutron in the 208 Pb(π − , π + ) 4 n reaction, by DCX on an α cluster inside lead, and then measure the tetraneutron absorption by another lead nucleus, leading to 212 Pb.…”
Section: The Pion Probementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the sake of completeness, let us mention two special, non-conventional uses of the negative-pion probe. Earlier, in 1979, Chultem et al had proposed an original use of a π − beam in a two-step process [31]. They hoped to produce a bound tetraneutron in the 208 Pb(π − , π + ) 4 n reaction, by DCX on an α cluster inside lead, and then measure the tetraneutron absorption by another lead nucleus, leading to 212 Pb.…”
Section: The Pion Probementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the first step, they irradiated uranium with 700 MeV protons, and exposed a lead sample behind an aluminum screen, again supposed to stop any charged particle. For the second step, they used the one that was described in the previous section for Chultem [31], the search for the 208 Pb( A n, xn) 212 Pb reaction through the α particles from its decay into 212 Bi and 212 Po. No trace of "polyneutrons" was found, shedding doubt on Détraz's results.…”
Section: Fission and Other Activation Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four years later, Miller et al repeated the experiment with better statistics and resolution [36], and confirmed the results. In parallel, Chultem et al proposed an original use of a π − beam in a two-step process [37]. If a bound tetraneutron had been produced in the 208 Pb(π − , π + ) 4 n reaction, by DCX on an α cluster inside lead, they might measure the tetraneutron absorption by another lead nucleus transforming it into 212 Pb, a probe similar to Turkevich's [22].…”
Section: Missing Mass: Pion Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%