2020
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2020.1225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search Duration

Abstract: This paper develops and estimates a model of sequential search that accounts for the full set of decisions consumers make while searching (which products to search, search longevity, sequence of purchases, and whether to purchase).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with previous literature, in which high search costs can be attributed to whether individuals make decisions on the basis of marginal or total returns (Kogut 1990;Sonnemans 1998), observed partial or incomplete search history (Bronnenberg, Kim, and Mela 2016), assumed search method (Honka and Chintagunta 2017), heuristic rules (Camerer 1995;Zwick et al 2003), or how paid search (Blake, Nosko, and Tadelis 2015) or recommendations (Dellaert and Häubl 2012) are accounted for, we show that ignoring heterogeneity in prior beliefs can result in overestimating search costs even in the absence of paid search or recommendations and when the complete search history and search method are known. Our results, thus, lend support to the more recent literature in marketing that estimates and allows for heterogeneity in prior beliefs (Ursu, Wang, and Chintagunta 2020;Zhang, Ursu, and Erdem 2020).…”
Section: Search Cost Estimatessupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with previous literature, in which high search costs can be attributed to whether individuals make decisions on the basis of marginal or total returns (Kogut 1990;Sonnemans 1998), observed partial or incomplete search history (Bronnenberg, Kim, and Mela 2016), assumed search method (Honka and Chintagunta 2017), heuristic rules (Camerer 1995;Zwick et al 2003), or how paid search (Blake, Nosko, and Tadelis 2015) or recommendations (Dellaert and Häubl 2012) are accounted for, we show that ignoring heterogeneity in prior beliefs can result in overestimating search costs even in the absence of paid search or recommendations and when the complete search history and search method are known. Our results, thus, lend support to the more recent literature in marketing that estimates and allows for heterogeneity in prior beliefs (Ursu, Wang, and Chintagunta 2020;Zhang, Ursu, and Erdem 2020).…”
Section: Search Cost Estimatessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Previous literature assumes either that consumers have rational expectations and do not learn about the price distribution (Honka 2014; Honka and Chintagunta 2017; Mehta, Rajiv, and Srinivasan 2003; Zwick et al 2003) or that consumers update their beliefs, which can explain revisits to previously searched information (Bronnenberg, Kim, and Mela 2016; Dang, Ursu, and Chintagunta 2020). The empirical literature allowing for learning assumes that consumers engage in Bayesian updating with either normally distributed priors (Chick and Frazier 2012; Ursu, Wang, and Chintagunta 2020; Zhang, Ursu, and Erdem 2020), Dirichlet priors (Hu, Dang, and Chintagunta 2019; Koulayev 2013; Wu 2017), or Dirichlet process priors (De los Santos, Hortacsu, and Wildenbeest 2017; Häubl, Dellaert, and Donkers 2010).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that some of the average parameter estimates are not within two standard errors of their true values. This is not uncommon for search models estimated using SMLE (see, e.g., Honka 2014 ; Ursu 2018 ; Ursu et al 2020 ). 21…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 92%