2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2009
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2009.5152769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search-based planning for a legged robot over rough terrain

Abstract: : Vernaza, P.; Likhachev, M.; Bhattacharya, S.; Chitta, S.; Kushleyev, A.; Lee, D.D., "Search-based planning for a legged robot over rough terrain," Robotics and Automation, 2009. ICRA '09. IEEE International Conference on , vol., no., pp.2380-2387 This material is posted here with permission of the IEEE. Such permission of the IEEE does not in any way imply IEEE endorsement of any of the University of Pennsylvania's products or services. Internal or personal use of this material is permitted. However, permis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can cause the robot to locally navigate into an unsurmountable obstacle. To avoid this, some controllers [15], [13] globally plan the complete footsteps from start to goal, though in this case time consuming replanning is necessary in case of slippage or deviation from the planned path. The approach in [12] stands between the two above mentioned methods and plans a global rough body path to avoid local minima, but the specific footholds are chosen only a few steps in advance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can cause the robot to locally navigate into an unsurmountable obstacle. To avoid this, some controllers [15], [13] globally plan the complete footsteps from start to goal, though in this case time consuming replanning is necessary in case of slippage or deviation from the planned path. The approach in [12] stands between the two above mentioned methods and plans a global rough body path to avoid local minima, but the specific footholds are chosen only a few steps in advance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The teams involved in this competition produced similar planning and control solutions [10], [11], [12]. All teams built upon a global plan over sets of given maps, while footholds were selected with hand-tuned, and learnt, features of varying terrain area resolution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem has been the focus of much research work resulting in a variety of generally cost based approaches [10], [12]. Most of such approaches assume accurate and global knowledge of the locomotion surface and often millimeter-accurate localization from an external source, typically a motion capture system.…”
Section: B Deliberate Planning Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date most of the locomotion literature has addressed operation in the extremes: either fixed, consistent terrain wherein a specific gait can be tuned over repeated trials and accumulating experience [2,[4][5][6][7][8] or wildly varied footing conditions [9][10][11][12] wherein it is not at all clear that the notion of a gait is even appropriate. We are aware of only two investigations of adaptive legged locomotion in the presumably far more common middleground setting of challenging but "modestly" varying terrain: on-line deterministic gait parameter feedback [13]; and tuned robustness against stochastic perturbation of an open loop stride-map as an alternative to deterministic gaits [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%