2019
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2018.2872326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seamless Transfer Scheme With Unified Control Core for Paralleled Systems

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the GC state, the inverter is controlled as a current source, and the inductor current references are listed as (1) and (2). The steady state error of inductor current will be zero with the PI controller GI; therefore, the inductor current in the GC state can be represented as…”
Section: ) Analysis Of Operation Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the GC state, the inverter is controlled as a current source, and the inductor current references are listed as (1) and (2). The steady state error of inductor current will be zero with the PI controller GI; therefore, the inductor current in the GC state can be represented as…”
Section: ) Analysis Of Operation Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Regulating the voltage amplitude and frequency in the SA state [1]. Compared with the control objectives )1) and (3) in steady state, a more difficult challenge is the seamless transfer from GC state to SA state, because control targets in the GC and SA states are noticeably different, which may burden the transfers between states with inrush currents and even system crashes [2]. Thus, different kinds of control methods are proposed to realize the seamless transfer from the GC state to SA state, which can be classified into three categories: 1) droop control; 2) hybrid current and voltage mode (HCVM) control; 3) self-adaptive control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 Obviously, to achieve a smooth transient process during intended or unintended islanding occurrence is highly expected in order to prevent fault trigger and protect voltage sensitive critical load. [11][12][13][14] However, this is very challenging to handle unintended islanding as a result of the existing "blanking time" by unavoidable delay time with any islanding detection methods and controller mode transfer, which makes such system suffer from distorted PCC voltage and even system instability in case without dedicated design for reliable operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of operating the distribution system in gridconnected and islanded modes, a smooth mode transfer with synchronisation scheme is necessary to improve the reliability of the supply across the emergency loads [8,9]. Therefore, various islanding and synchronisation schemes [10][11][12] have been proposed to synchronise/island the distribution grid. However, developing a robust synchronisation method is still a challenging task as a conventional phase-locked loop (PLL) has a significant phase error during transitions [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%