2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2020.102879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seamless integration of computer-aided geometric modeling and acoustic simulation: Isogeometric boundary element methods based on Catmull-Clark subdivision surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The core concept of the IGABEM is to employ basis functions used in Computer-Aided Design (CAD) for geometric modeling to solve boundary integral equation that are transformed from the partial differential equations. As such, IGABEM enables numerical simulation to be conducted from CAD directly which avoids the cumbersome meshing procedure and retains geometric accuracy [13][14][15]. Unlike isogeometric finite element analysis, a volume parameterization is not needed in IGABEM, because both BEM and CAD are boundaryrepresented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The core concept of the IGABEM is to employ basis functions used in Computer-Aided Design (CAD) for geometric modeling to solve boundary integral equation that are transformed from the partial differential equations. As such, IGABEM enables numerical simulation to be conducted from CAD directly which avoids the cumbersome meshing procedure and retains geometric accuracy [13][14][15]. Unlike isogeometric finite element analysis, a volume parameterization is not needed in IGABEM, because both BEM and CAD are boundaryrepresented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be attributed to its simplicity, generality, and well-established ecosystem. Although the Catmull-Clark subdivision surfaces have been successfully incorporated into IGABEM for numerical simulation [15,38], to the best of our knowledge, no study has been reported on topology optimization thus far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because both the BEM and CAD are based on boundary representation [5][6][7], they are naturally compatible with each other. IGA in the context of the boundary element method (IGABEM) has been successfully applied to a wide range of areas, including potential problems [8], linear elasticity [9,10], fracture mechanics [11][12][13][14], structural optimization [15][16][17][18], acoustics [19][20][21][22][23][24][25], and heat conduction [26,27], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [11] solved the three-dimensional elasto-plastic problem by boundary element method. On the contrary, boundary element method (BEM) [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] only needs boundary parameterization and thus is compatible with CAD models naturally. The isogeometric analysis with boundary element method (IGABEM) was first applied to potential problems [20] and elasticity analysis [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%