1993
DOI: 10.1159/000261608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sealants Revisted: An Update of the Effectiveness of Pit-and-Fissure Sealants

Abstract: The first sealant clinical trials used cyanoacrylate-based materials. These were replaced by dimethacrylate-based products which were marketed. A major difference between marketed sealants is their method of polymerization. First-generation sealants were initiated by ultraviolet light, second-generation sealants are autopolymerized, and third-generation sealants use visible light. Over time, clinical retention was found to be greater for second generation as compared with first-generation sealants. Five to 7 y… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
109
0
19

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
109
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…But the success of the sealant for caries prevention depends on long-term retention. [7][8][9] The study done by Janet C Hitt, 10 investigated bond strength in vitro, when bonding agent was used beneath sealants under varied conditions of contamination. Bonding agent used without contamination yielded bond strengths significantly greater than the bond strength obtained when using sealant alone without contamination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the success of the sealant for caries prevention depends on long-term retention. [7][8][9] The study done by Janet C Hitt, 10 investigated bond strength in vitro, when bonding agent was used beneath sealants under varied conditions of contamination. Bonding agent used without contamination yielded bond strengths significantly greater than the bond strength obtained when using sealant alone without contamination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluoride is incorporated into resins by two waysthe first utilizes a soluble fluoride salt which, after application, dissolves releasing fluoride ions,which may compromise the integrity of the resin [18] .This method has been questioned, because fluoride release resulting from the dissolution of a soluble salt might weaken the sealant and thereby might reduce its usefulness as a preventive agent [19]. The other system uses an organic fluoride that is subsequently released by an exchange with other ions in the system [20].…”
Section: Generations Of Pit and Fissure Sealants First Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While autopolymerizing sealants have been observed for as long as 15 years, newer materials have only been subject to short-term follow-up. Since the highest rate of sealant loss occurs during the first year after application, 6 the calculation of annualized loss rates can mean that sealants observed for short periods of time can appear to be less effective. Nevertheless, currently available evidence indicates the following: 7 • Autopolymerizing sealants have high longterm retention rates, with 60% of surfaces remaining covered after 5 to 7 years.…”
Section: Which Is the Best Sealant Materials To Use?mentioning
confidence: 99%