Biological Sampling in the Deep Sea 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781118332535.ch14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seafloor Observatories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The long-term acquisition of high-resolution infra-annual time series of faunal and environmental changes is therefore essential to gain further knowledge on factors driving community dynamics in these ecosystems. The development of deep-sea observatories now offers this possibility (Matabos et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long-term acquisition of high-resolution infra-annual time series of faunal and environmental changes is therefore essential to gain further knowledge on factors driving community dynamics in these ecosystems. The development of deep-sea observatories now offers this possibility (Matabos et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Platforms that integrate ocean sensors and operate over a long time at sea can be fixed, e.g., surface buoys, moorings and landers, or mobile such as Argo floats, crawlers, surface vehicles, gliders and Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV) (Aguzzi et al, 2019;Rountree et al, 2020). These platforms can be cabled with power and data transmission ensured from the shore -but unchangeable location strongly constrains the cable route and price -, or wireless with battery and data storage capabilities dimensioned according to the duration of the foreseen deployment on board the seabed station (Matabos et al, 2016). The future directions on platforms' development need to address a number of limitations highlighted through the experience acquired over a decade of operation (also see Rountree et al, 2020): i) The operational cost is high, partly because underwater vehicles are required for maintenance operation to place the sensor with precision and perform underwater connection; ii) the time between the maintenance operations is limited due to requirement for sensor calibration and, in case of wireless system, for energy pack and data storage replacement; iii) the spatial coverage is limited to the close surrounding of the seabed station; iv) new regulation will urge for new deployment processes with low environmental footprint; v) a larger number and variety of sensors are fundamental for multidisciplinary approaches and the amount of energy and volume of data storage needed keeps increasing.…”
Section: Sensing and Monitoring Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolving from single-station cabled seafloor installations (Butler et al 2000;Petitt et al 2002;Romanowicz et al 2006), ambitious multi-station, multi-instrument cabled arrays have been rooted on the seafloor off the coasts of Japan (Hirata et al 2002;Shinohara et al 2014), the Canadian Northeast Pacific (Barnes et al 2013;Matabos et al 2016), and Oregon (Cowles et al 2010;Toomey et al 2014;Kelley et al 2016) for the longterm monitoring of the oceanic environment from the shelf to the deep ocean. These installations provide high-quality data with low latency, but they require massive upfront costs, demand costly maintenance, are limited by cables and, being permanent, cannot be rapidly reinstalled or reassigned in the case of developing seismic crises (e.g.…”
Section: Introduction and Historical Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%