2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-020-3672-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seabirds as environmental indicators: foraging behaviour and ecophysiology of common diving petrels (Pelecanoides urinatrix) reflect local-scale differences in prey availability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here foraging behaviour is assumed to occur when birds fly at very low speeds [53]. Modelling methods have also been used to predict diving behaviour taking the sequence of trajectory data into account through hidden Markov models (HMM) typically with 2 or 3 distinct behavioural modes [6,13,32,37], and more occasionally through gaussian mixtures models [18,33], or supervised machine learning approaches such as artificial neural networks, support vector machine, and random forests [19,52]. We may refer the reader to [24] for a more detailed review of these methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here foraging behaviour is assumed to occur when birds fly at very low speeds [53]. Modelling methods have also been used to predict diving behaviour taking the sequence of trajectory data into account through hidden Markov models (HMM) typically with 2 or 3 distinct behavioural modes [6,13,32,37], and more occasionally through gaussian mixtures models [18,33], or supervised machine learning approaches such as artificial neural networks, support vector machine, and random forests [19,52]. We may refer the reader to [24] for a more detailed review of these methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in CDP individuals that had to travel further to meet energetic demands (Dunphy et al, 2020), potentially reducing reproductive success (Kitaysky, Piatt and Wingfield, 2007).…”
Section: Consequences For Species Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the carbon isotope results indicate females may also be foraging further from shore than males (Peterson and Fry, 1987), it is possible that their increased energy demands from a longer flight are not being met with energy rich prey (Dean et al, 2013). Previous studies have demonstrated that the stress of travelling further to forage for prey can contribute to higher levels of stress hormones (corticosterone; Crossin et al, 2012;Dunphy et al, 2020), which in turn can have a negative impact on reproductive success (Kitaysky, Piatt and Wingfield, 2007). If female demands of foraging further from the colony than males, this could be a contributing factor to the slow population recovery through compromising reproductive success.…”
Section: Intraspecific Trophic Dynamics For the Whdpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…have been tracked for a portion of their annual cycles (Adams & Takekawa 2008, Navarro et al 2013, Rayner et al 2017, Halpin et al 2018, Hedd et al 2018, Paiva et al 2018, Lago et al 2019, Pollet et al 2019, BirdLife International Seabird Tracking Database 2020, Bolton 2020, Dunphy et al 2020, Rotger et al 2020, Wikelski & Keys 2020. Year-round studies covering > 1 annual cycle are virtually absent for any of these species (Pollet et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%