Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics III 2015
DOI: 10.1201/b18442-36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seabed stiffness model for steel catenary risers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the first 100 cycles the unloading stiffness falls, mirroring the secant penetration stiffness and reflecting the remoulding process. The trends shown by this data reflect the short-term model tests results presented by Aubeny et al (2015), as well as the calculation model they present. However, in later cycles the unloading stiffness rises, reflecting the reconsolidation process.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the first 100 cycles the unloading stiffness falls, mirroring the secant penetration stiffness and reflecting the remoulding process. The trends shown by this data reflect the short-term model tests results presented by Aubeny et al (2015), as well as the calculation model they present. However, in later cycles the unloading stiffness rises, reflecting the reconsolidation process.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…A limited range of experimental studies have been used to validate these models, through short term cyclic loading (Bridge et al, 2004;Aubeny et al, 2008). Recent work has focussed on calibrating the reduction in stiffness caused by remoulding in the first few tens of movement cycles (Aubeny et al, 2015). In addition, threedimensional simulations of a catenary riser touchdown zone have been performed at various scales, yielding bending moment profiles through the TDZ (Bridge and Willis, 2002;Hodder and Byrne, 2010;Elliot et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2014) Current prediction models for riser-seabed interaction do not explicitly incorporate the strength properties of the seabed soil to quantify the resistance to cyclic motion of the riser.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of the soft soil is degraded compared to a virgin seabed that has not been penetrated. Although some authors indicate that the loosed soil, if left for a long period, can reconsolidate and regain appreciable strength (Hodder et al 2009, Yuan et al 2017, other authors suggested that the strength regained is significantly less than that before the seabed was penetrated (Aubeny et al 2015, Clukey et al 2008). However, the degradation of the seabed strength in stiffness and suction is captured by the RQ model (Randolph and Quiggin 2009).…”
Section: Pre-trench Resistance and Scr Tdz Bending Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%