2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2022.107934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seabed morphology and bed shear stress predict temperate reef habitats in a high energy marine region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, as the observational species abundance data used here were exclusively acquired through grab and core samples, the modeled layers assume that the whole study region consists of sediments that can be sampled using these devices. It is well understood that there are seabed regions within our spatial extent which comprise coarser areas of the seabed (e.g., gravel, cobble and rock; Irving, 2009;Jackson-Bué et al, 2022) which the current sediment predictor layer models do not identify (see Mitchell, Aldridge, & Deising, 2019). To address this issue, coarse habitat areas should be clipped from the spatial raster layers during subsequent iterations of our numerical modeling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as the observational species abundance data used here were exclusively acquired through grab and core samples, the modeled layers assume that the whole study region consists of sediments that can be sampled using these devices. It is well understood that there are seabed regions within our spatial extent which comprise coarser areas of the seabed (e.g., gravel, cobble and rock; Irving, 2009;Jackson-Bué et al, 2022) which the current sediment predictor layer models do not identify (see Mitchell, Aldridge, & Deising, 2019). To address this issue, coarse habitat areas should be clipped from the spatial raster layers during subsequent iterations of our numerical modeling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When modeling these features, MLC will pick up the local changes in slope and associated rugosity but has difficulty linking these features into the larger unit that captures the full complexity of the bedrock unit. This indicates that MLC may not be the preferred method of mapping bedrock units compared with methods such as machine learning–based modeling (Jackson-Bue et al , 2022). However, as long as each of these unit boundaries is well delineated, it is simple for the user of the model outputs to merge these polygons while finalizing their interpretations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To incorporate relevant BNAM output into the modeling, each tow was joined with the bottom temperature, stress, and salinity values, which corresponded spatiotemporally (i.e., to the month and year the tow was conducted). Bottom stress was of particular interest because it is believed to exert a mechanistic influence on benthic communities and has shown utility in mapping some benthic habitats (Jackson-Bué et al, 2022). Further, it can serve as a proxy for sediment grain size (Ward et al, 2015); this is a useful trait given that C. frondosa seems to prefer harder substrate types on the Scotian Shelf (Harper, 2020).…”
Section: Environmental Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%