2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-017-2211-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seabed images versus corer sampling: a comparison of two quantitative approaches for the analysis of marine benthic communities in the southern Weddell Sea (Southern Ocean)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Macrofauna assemblages of the investigated soft sediments were dominated by polychaetes. This finding matches well with those of previous studies from Southern Ocean shelf areas (Arntz et al 1994, Gutt 2007, Glover et al 2008, Pineda-Metz & Gerdes 2018. On the basis of our findings, we assumed that the limited input and availability of fresh material and the amount of organic matter at the seafloor were limiting factors for macrofauna abundances.…”
Section: Meiofauna Communities Reflect Ice-cover Categories Better Th...supporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Macrofauna assemblages of the investigated soft sediments were dominated by polychaetes. This finding matches well with those of previous studies from Southern Ocean shelf areas (Arntz et al 1994, Gutt 2007, Glover et al 2008, Pineda-Metz & Gerdes 2018. On the basis of our findings, we assumed that the limited input and availability of fresh material and the amount of organic matter at the seafloor were limiting factors for macrofauna abundances.…”
Section: Meiofauna Communities Reflect Ice-cover Categories Better Th...supporting
confidence: 93%
“…The MUC is a useful sampling gear for soft sediments, but using it might underestimate large and comparatively rare benthic macrofauna because of the small sampling area of the cores. These problems might be mitigated by higher deployment numbers, analysis of more cores, or use in combination with other sampling gear (Piepenburg & von Juterzenka 1994, Pineda-Metz & Gerdes 2018. Note that we used cores with different sampling surfaces (MUC6: 25.5 cm 2 ; MUC10: 69.4 cm 2 ; see Table 1 for stations).…”
Section: Meiofauna Communities Reflect Ice-cover Categories Better Th...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparative analysis of benthic infauna (collected using multibox corer) and epifauna (obtained from imagery) in the southern Weddell Sea similarly found comparable spatial distribution patterns (Pineda-Metz and Gerdes, 2018), suggesting this pattern may be widespread in the Southern Ocean. The generally strong concordance between macro-infauna and megaepifauna patterns across our entire study area suggests that these elements of the fauna are responding to similar environmental constraints at this scale (e.g., large-scale differences in organic content, benthic production, hydrodynamic conditions).…”
Section: Concordance Of Spatial Patterns In Mega-epifauna and Macro-infauna Benthic Community Compositionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…By keeping the same 26 megapixel camera mounted on the OFOBS as was used on the OFOS, as well as the same illumination sources and deployment methodologies, temporal comparisons of seafloor communities and physical conditions can be made directly between data collected in different years, avoiding inter-comparability problems associated with varying these parameters (Schoening et al, 2020;Jaffe, 2015). As noted in (Pineda-Metz and Gerdes, 2018), fauna analysis of a region is most completely approached by sampling stations with both camera equipment and physical sampling methodologies, such as box, multibox-and multi-corer. During the PS124 expedition a multibox corer (Gerdes, 1990) was also used to sample the surface and infauna megafauna directly, with multicorers also being deployed to allow analysis of the micro and meio-infauna (Hellmer and Holtappels, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%