2004
DOI: 10.1029/2002jc001617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sea‐to‐air fluxes from measurements of the atmospheric gradient of dimethylsulfide and comparison with simultaneous relaxed eddy accumulation measurements

Abstract: [1] We measured vertical profiles of dimethylsulfide (DMS) in the atmospheric marine boundary layer from R/P FLIP during the 2000 FAIRS cruise. Applying Monin-Obukhov similarity theory to the DMS gradients and simultaneous micrometeorological data, we calculated sea-to-air DMS fluxes for 34 profiles. From the fluxes and measured seawater DMS concentrations, we calculated the waterside gas transfer velocity, k w . Gas transfer velocities from the gradient flux approach are within the range of previous commonly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Putaud and Nguyen (1996) reported GF estimates of DMS flux from a ship, but interpretation of the derived transfer velocities was hindered by considerable variability in the results. Zemmelink et al (2002) have studied the suitability of GF and REA for DMS flux measurements over the ocean in a nearshore environment and subsequently reported measurements obtained in the open sea during the FAIRS project on the spar platform R/P FLIP (Zemmelink et al, 2004b;Hintsa et al, 2004). While transfer velocity estimates from FAIRS were reasonable in comparison to commonly used gas transfer parameterizations, they report an unexplained bias between the two methods, with REA yielding fluxes up to 2 times higher than GF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Putaud and Nguyen (1996) reported GF estimates of DMS flux from a ship, but interpretation of the derived transfer velocities was hindered by considerable variability in the results. Zemmelink et al (2002) have studied the suitability of GF and REA for DMS flux measurements over the ocean in a nearshore environment and subsequently reported measurements obtained in the open sea during the FAIRS project on the spar platform R/P FLIP (Zemmelink et al, 2004b;Hintsa et al, 2004). While transfer velocity estimates from FAIRS were reasonable in comparison to commonly used gas transfer parameterizations, they report an unexplained bias between the two methods, with REA yielding fluxes up to 2 times higher than GF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, DMS fluxes are well suited to measurement by micrometeorological techniques. Hintsa et al (2004) Zemmelink et al (2004) employed the gradient and relaxed eddy accumulation techniques to measure DMS fluxes in coastal waters. Eddy correlation measurements require the use of a fast response (∼1 s) chemical sensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zemmelink et al (2002b) performed trials using GF in conjunction with the relaxed eddy accumulation (REA) technique from a dock with promising results, although without the complications of ship motion. Hintsa et al (2004) subsequently used the stable platform RP FLIP in the northeast Pacific to measure DMS fluxes using both GF and REA techniques. They found DMS gradient fluxes were half that of REA fluxes with the largest discrepancy during stable to neutral conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%