2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2019.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sea surface temperature inversion model for infrared remote sensing images based on deep neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistical results show that the accuracy of water depth retrieval is significantly reduced when the depth is lower than 15 m; the accuracy of retrieval is better when the depth is greater than -10 m. The mean absolute error (MAE) of ZY3 image can reach 0.668; the MAE of WV2 image can reach 0.447. In this article, Numpy is applied to establish a linear regression model [51]; Keras is applied to establish a single-layer neural network model and a CNN model [52]; and then the above three models are applied to perform retrieval experiments on WV2 data. A precision comparison analysis for these three models is shown in the Table V. The results show that the CNN has higher water depth retrieval accuracy than the statistical linear regression model and the single-layer neural network without considering adjacent pixels.…”
Section: Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical results show that the accuracy of water depth retrieval is significantly reduced when the depth is lower than 15 m; the accuracy of retrieval is better when the depth is greater than -10 m. The mean absolute error (MAE) of ZY3 image can reach 0.668; the MAE of WV2 image can reach 0.447. In this article, Numpy is applied to establish a linear regression model [51]; Keras is applied to establish a single-layer neural network model and a CNN model [52]; and then the above three models are applied to perform retrieval experiments on WV2 data. A precision comparison analysis for these three models is shown in the Table V. The results show that the CNN has higher water depth retrieval accuracy than the statistical linear regression model and the single-layer neural network without considering adjacent pixels.…”
Section: Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rozenstein et al [6] and Chen et al [7] revised the SWA to use data acquired by the Advanced Very-High-Resolution Radiometer instruments onboard the United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) family of satellites in order to retrieve SSTs from Landsat satellite data. Ai et al [8] presented a new SWA-based SST retrieval model and validated its reliability by comparing SST data for the Bohai Sea with those extracted from a MODIS SST product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, IR radiometers measure SSTs using the brightness temperatures (BTs) of thermal infrared (TIR) bands at 11 μm and 12 μm or using TIR bands combined with the mid-infrared band (e.g., at 3.7 μm for VIIRS) by applying split-window algorithms (e.g., the multichannel SST algorithm (MCSST) [10] and nonlinear SST algorithm (NLSST) [1]), physical models based on radiative transfer model simulations [12], [13], or neural network models [14]. SST retrieval algorithms can be developed for the global ocean [15]- [17] or for regional marine waters [18]- [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%