2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sea state conditions for marine structures' analysis and model tests

Abstract: The study reviews, based on the state-of-the-art findings, some uncertainties associated with wave data and models currently used in design and operation procedures of ship and offshore structures. Although the same basic principles prevail for hydrodynamic loads on ships and offshore structures, actual problems and methods for assessing these loads in the design and operation stage are not the same. Different wave data and models are used for specifying design and operational criteria for these two types of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The database was originally obtained as a numerical hindcast performed by the third-generation wave model WAM by ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast) and calibrated with satellite altimetry measurements collected from eight different satellite missions: Geosat (1986)(1987)(1988)(1989), Topex (1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002), Topex/Poseidon (2002)(2003)(2004)(2005), Jason (2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008), EnviSat (2002-2010), Geosat Follow-On (2000-2008), Jason-2 (2008-on-going), and Jason-1s (2009-2012) [13,14]. The database represents a state-of-the-art [2], comprehensive, and systematic (in space and time) source of wave data for the offshore Adriatic Sea basin, as it reports twelve different wave and wind physical parameters in 6 h intervals at 39 locations ( Figure 1). Numerically modelled wave data and collected altimetry data joined in a combined dataset were reported with a spatial resolution of 0.5 • × 0.5 • lat./long., starting from September 1992 to January 2016.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The database was originally obtained as a numerical hindcast performed by the third-generation wave model WAM by ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast) and calibrated with satellite altimetry measurements collected from eight different satellite missions: Geosat (1986)(1987)(1988)(1989), Topex (1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002), Topex/Poseidon (2002)(2003)(2004)(2005), Jason (2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008), EnviSat (2002-2010), Geosat Follow-On (2000-2008), Jason-2 (2008-on-going), and Jason-1s (2009-2012) [13,14]. The database represents a state-of-the-art [2], comprehensive, and systematic (in space and time) source of wave data for the offshore Adriatic Sea basin, as it reports twelve different wave and wind physical parameters in 6 h intervals at 39 locations ( Figure 1). Numerically modelled wave data and collected altimetry data joined in a combined dataset were reported with a spatial resolution of 0.5 • × 0.5 • lat./long., starting from September 1992 to January 2016.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accurate prediction of these extremes is indispensable for the risk-based design and operation of ships and offshore structures [1]. Bitner-Gregersen et al [2] provided an overview of state-of-the-art in sea state analysis by covering topics from wave data acquisition and wave modelling to the application of results in terms of loading input for ships and offshore structural design. When considering wave loading, it is important to keep track of the associated uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Uncertainties may be classified into two groups: aleatory and epistemic. Related to metocean description, aleatory uncertainty (natural and physic) considers natural randomness of random variable, such as variability of wave intensity in time [7]. This uncertainty is also known as intrinsic or inherent and cannot be reduced or eliminated.…”
Section: Figure 1 Schematic Representation Of Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here mainly uncertainties in metocean conditions and soil data are relevant, see e.g. [89], as well as uncertainty in extrapolation methods for extreme events ( [90]). Furthermore, differences of the numerical model to the as-built structure are also an important aspect.…”
Section: Limitations and Current Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%