2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sea salt aerosol deposition in the coastal zone: A large eddy simulation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Median Cl − concentration at DFO during Winter 3 is about 400% higher than median BDO/TFO Cl − concentrations, while median NO 3 − concentrations across the state are similar (Table ). Given that sea salt aerosol deposition rapidly decreases with distance from the coastline [ Gustafsson and Franzén , ; Liang et al ., ], there appears to be a strong source of non‐sea salt Cl − at DFO in Winter 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Median Cl − concentration at DFO during Winter 3 is about 400% higher than median BDO/TFO Cl − concentrations, while median NO 3 − concentrations across the state are similar (Table ). Given that sea salt aerosol deposition rapidly decreases with distance from the coastline [ Gustafsson and Franzén , ; Liang et al ., ], there appears to be a strong source of non‐sea salt Cl − at DFO in Winter 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longer aerosol transport times [ Adolph et al ., ] suggest that DFO receives BC that has had more time to react with strong oxidizing agents in the atmosphere (e.g., ozone) thus functionalizing the surface [ Sergides et al ., ]. Longer aerosol transport times could also lead to a decrease in particle size as heavier particles are more likely to drop out [ Liang et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S5) from the logarithmic profile expected to occur from an active dust emission source (Stull, 1988;Kind, 1992;Gillies and Berkofsky, 2004), a result that we inferred as the influence of sea-salt aerosol. Because we measured dust 15 concentrations ~650 meters from the shoreline, we expect increasing sea-salt aerosol concentration with height due to the upwind deposition of near-surface sea-salt aerosol (Liang et al, 2016). We generally observed an increasing concentration with height for the lowest two or three OPCs when saltation was inactive (horizontal saltation flux = 0), consistent with sea-salt aerosol deposition, but found a decrease in concentration with height when saltation was active ( > 0), consistent with dust emission (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S5) deviated from the logarithmic profiles expected to occur 169 from an active emission source (Stull, 1988;Kind, 1992;Gillies and Berkofsky, 2004), a result that we 170 inferred as the influence of sea-salt aerosol. Because we measured dust concentrations ~650 meters from 171 the shoreline, we expect increasing sea-salt aerosol concentration with height due to the upwind deposition 172 of near-surface sea-salt aerosol (Liang et al, 2016). We indeed generally observed an increasing 173 concentration with height for the lowest two or three OPCs when saltation was inactive (horizontal saltation 174 flux = 0), consistent with sea-salt deposition, but found a decrease in concentration with height when saltation was active ( > 0), consistent with dust emission (Fig.…”
Section: Removal Of Sea-salt Aerosol Deposition Signal From Dust Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%