2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2021.151602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sea otter carrying capacity in a soft- and mixed-sediment benthic habitat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sea otter populations in California and the Aleutian Islands, Alaska, show a greater preference for sea urchins compared with those in eastern Hokkaido (Estes et al, 1978; Estes et al, 1980; LaRoche et al, 2021; Watt et al, 2000). Sea otter dietary preference correlates with prey abundance, and they do not necessarily require a wide range of prey to thrive (Ostfeld 1982; Tinker et al 2008; Wolt et al 2012; Davis et al 2021). The unusual HAB (Gail, 1950; Orlova et al, 2002) in eastern Hokkaido provided an opportunity to observe the ecosystem effects at two trophic levels (Hasegawa et al, 2022; Iwataki et al 2022; Kuroda et al 2021; Kuroda et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sea otter populations in California and the Aleutian Islands, Alaska, show a greater preference for sea urchins compared with those in eastern Hokkaido (Estes et al, 1978; Estes et al, 1980; LaRoche et al, 2021; Watt et al, 2000). Sea otter dietary preference correlates with prey abundance, and they do not necessarily require a wide range of prey to thrive (Ostfeld 1982; Tinker et al 2008; Wolt et al 2012; Davis et al 2021). The unusual HAB (Gail, 1950; Orlova et al, 2002) in eastern Hokkaido provided an opportunity to observe the ecosystem effects at two trophic levels (Hasegawa et al, 2022; Iwataki et al 2022; Kuroda et al 2021; Kuroda et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is a step forward in exploring additional habitat features that may be important for estimating sea otter carrying capacity in southcentral Alaska, as has been done in California with southern sea otters (Tinker et al., 2021 ). However, a component necessary for carrying capacity estimates is prey availability data, which influences equilibrium densities of sea otters (Davis et al., 2021 ; Dean et al., 2002 ). Despite large efforts to model carrying capacity in other regions, many studies (Eisaguirre et al., 2021 ; Hale et al., 2022 ; Lu et al., 2020 ; Tinker et al., 2019 , 2021 ; Williams et al., 2019 ), including the one presented here, have not incorporated sea otter prey information directly, which is recommended for future modeling efforts (Davis et al., 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Including estimates of available prey energy is also critical for accurately estimating equilibrium density of sea otters. Regions with stable sea otter populations have been found to increase in abundance after being considered standards for equilibrium densities, pointing to prey availability as a more reliable metric (Davis et al., 2021 ; Hale et al., 2019 , 2022 ). We recommend combining a suite of known sea otter‐associated metrics in future studies to improve model AUC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%