2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sea-ice thickness distribution of the Bellingshausen Sea from surface measurements and ICESat altimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6d): 30 cm, mostly in the MIZ where significant melt occurred into late August, and 130 cm, mostly in the high latitude area, with mean 101 ± 56 cm and median 125 cm for the entire leg, and mean 120 ± 38 cm and median 130 cm for the pack ice zone alone (not shown). None of these two thickness distributions (northward and southward) shows a single peak with long tail to right, which is a common ice thickness distribution from other means such as field measurements and remote sensing (Haas et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2013;Weissling et al, 2011;Xie et al, 2011Xie et al, , 2013Zwally et al, 2008). This behavior indicates that the visual observation of ice thickness (even at the half hourly rate) is still very selective of the level ice thickness and probably undersamples thicker ice.…”
Section: Northward and Southward Legsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6d): 30 cm, mostly in the MIZ where significant melt occurred into late August, and 130 cm, mostly in the high latitude area, with mean 101 ± 56 cm and median 125 cm for the entire leg, and mean 120 ± 38 cm and median 130 cm for the pack ice zone alone (not shown). None of these two thickness distributions (northward and southward) shows a single peak with long tail to right, which is a common ice thickness distribution from other means such as field measurements and remote sensing (Haas et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2013;Weissling et al, 2011;Xie et al, 2011Xie et al, , 2013Zwally et al, 2008). This behavior indicates that the visual observation of ice thickness (even at the half hourly rate) is still very selective of the level ice thickness and probably undersamples thicker ice.…”
Section: Northward and Southward Legsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This behavior indicates that the visual observation of ice thickness (even at the half hourly rate) is still very selective of the level ice thickness and probably undersamples thicker ice. One major reason is that visually observed ice thickness is derived by measuring the thickness of the upturned ice blocks adjacent to the ship's hull against a scale fixed above the water line, while thicker and ridged ice is usually broken apart during overturning (Toyota et al, 2004;Xie et al, 2011). Figure 6 shows the snow and ice thickness measured from the EM31 mounted off the ship's left side.…”
Section: Northward and Southward Legsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Worby et al, 2011;Xie et al, 2011). However, these corrections vary regionally, depending on local ice conditions.…”
Section: Modulating the Response To Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found the highest snow freeboard and the thickest ice in the western Weddell Sea and a clear seasonal cycle of the snow freeboard with the highest values in summer (since all the thin ice is melted away) and lower values in the beginning of winter (due to new ice formation). A comparison between field data and ICESat ground tracks in the Bellingshausen Sea showed a good agreement between both methods (Xie et al, 2011). Recently, Kern and Spreen (2015) estimated the potential uncertainty of sea-ice thicknesses derived from ICESat and AMSR-E snow depths, which ranges between 20 and 80 %.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%