1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7714(05)80062-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sea Carousel—A benthic, annular flume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
86
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, the main approaches used to study cohesive sediments are laboratory flumes (van Leussen and Winterwerp, 1990;Schieber et al, 2007;Young and Southard, 1978), in situ flumes (Amos et al, 1992;Young and Southard, 1978), field studies (DeVries, 1992), and modeling (Sanford and Maa, 2001). The primary difficulty in studying erosion of cohesive sediments is the vast number of variables that influence erosion, ranging from grain size to ionic charge and sediment composition (Mehta et al, 1989;Schieber et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, the main approaches used to study cohesive sediments are laboratory flumes (van Leussen and Winterwerp, 1990;Schieber et al, 2007;Young and Southard, 1978), in situ flumes (Amos et al, 1992;Young and Southard, 1978), field studies (DeVries, 1992), and modeling (Sanford and Maa, 2001). The primary difficulty in studying erosion of cohesive sediments is the vast number of variables that influence erosion, ranging from grain size to ionic charge and sediment composition (Mehta et al, 1989;Schieber et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among flume tanks, annular flume has been extensively used to investigate various physical, chemical and biological factors which may influence the stability and erodibility of natural cohesive sediments [6][7][8][9][10]. One of the major advantages of annular flume is its fully developed boundary layer above the sediment due to the constant channel geometry and infinite flow length [11], converting the length of straight flume into criterion that satisfies lead-time and long distance during particle flocculation and sedimentation [6]. In addition, annular flume is more suited to investigating the cohesive sediment dynamics, as the flocculated suspensions are not disrupted by re-circulating pumps and filters [12], and this is beneficial to the measurement of SPM characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of and distinction between erosion Type I and II (Fig. 1) follow the description given by Parchure and Mehta (1985), Amos et al (1992) and Neumeier et al (2007). Net erosion rates (E, mg m À2 s À1 ) were estimated from SSC at the end of the time step with the highest free-stream current velocity within the Type I erosion regime: E ¼ dM/ dt ¼ (SSC end À SSC start )*V/A*Dt, where M is the eroded mass, SSC end is final suspended sediment concentration in the last time step, SSC start is the suspended sediment concentration at the end of the previous time step, V is the flume volume in litres, A is the flume channel basal area (0.06 m 2 ) and Dt is the duration of the last step in seconds.…”
Section: Erosion Threshold and Erosion Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%