2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SDMF: Systematic Decision-making Framework for Evaluation of Software Architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since our model is universal, we have assumed that the weight of all metrics is the same. The effectiveness of similar mathematical models applied in software design, software architectures and software evaluation are discussed in [37], [38].…”
Section: A Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since our model is universal, we have assumed that the weight of all metrics is the same. The effectiveness of similar mathematical models applied in software design, software architectures and software evaluation are discussed in [37], [38].…”
Section: A Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linguistic scale known as Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN) represents the fuzziness and uncertainty in human decision making. Besides that, Upadhyay et al [15] implemented the TOPSIS technique in their proposed framework to reincorporate the complex domains composed of diverse internal and external factors in the software architecture evaluation process to obtain user's requirements satisfaction. An in-depth interdisciplinary exploratory study conducted by Mjeda et al [16] showed that several MCDA techniques could be used to improve SPLE approaches.…”
Section: Mcda Techniques In Architecture Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%